www.givethemback.com
After Katrina New Orleans police confiscated many legally owned guns. While there could be an arguement that they an unarmed public would be safer such an arguement misses the point that the legal firearms are generally owned by law abiding citizens. Meanwhile the illegal firearms, are more generally owned by people who are threats to peace. Regardless of any mistakes made at that time how could not returning these legal fireams be defended?
2006-11-04 03:01:32 · 6 answers · asked by gatzap 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
On that site they say the police are demanding more than the basic identification as the gun owner. They are wanting the original bill of sale. That could be non existant in the case of a gift or family heirloom. Or in Kansas or Tobago with the storm.
2006-11-04 13:22:00 · update #1
I understand that they can indeed return the guns but the owners will have to make application and show proof of ownership of the gun
2006-11-04 03:38:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
this might actually sign the subsequent revolution interior the U. S.. decrease than the circumstances defined the persons does no longer stand for it. Hollywood has tried to situation us to the thought that the government ought to fully revert to a fascist state and that the defense force and police might blindly stick to. a technique or the different I doubt very heavily if that often is the case. this style of circulate might splinter the government, the defense force and civilian authority. the end result may well be anarchy and warring factions interior the streets. the only element that the author counts on in making drawing his conclusions is that persons does no longer be recommended on a great scale of this taking place in speedy style. the undertaking with that assumption is that it ignores the reality that concepts is very practically right this moment handed at the instant by skill of use of mediums like the internet. consequently the prepare ought to by no skill be contained and persons might set up right this moment in protection of their rights and freedoms.
2016-11-27 02:45:20 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if guns were illegal, it would be much easier to track illegal traffic, it would also change the culture that deems it acceptable to own such a lethal weapon. having a gun is such a common thing that gun related crimes do not even raise an eyebrow. ban the guns and it would be regarded as extremely offensive, as it should be... it is so easy to kill people at a safe distance, and so cowardly.
2006-11-04 03:31:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
dont worry the nra will make sure that nagin gives the guns back you can be sure of that . why did the ppl in new orleans re-elect ray nagin ? I mean he has possibly the worst mouth of any mayor black or white . and he has made some of the rudest comments about cities in general . But yeah i bet ppl from new orleans are disgusted with Nagin. good luck and god bless.
2006-11-04 03:09:33 · answer #4 · answered by Kate T. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
requiring an original bill of sale from somebody whose house was destroyed just adds insult to injury. As long as the person passes a normal background check and they can show some reasonable evidence that it's their property they should have their property returned to them.
2006-11-07 08:53:19 · answer #5 · answered by benminer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the NRA has went to court and won a court order for these guns to be returned, and Nagen has ignored this, so the NRA has filed another suit.
2006-11-04 03:04:47 · answer #6 · answered by 007 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋