I personally think wikipedia is, but even thats full of innacuracies kids
2006-11-04 02:12:56 · 21 answers · asked by Sean 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Lol Wikipedia. How many Bibles are there? and how many Wikipedias?
Big Difference it shows that (IM NOT OFFENDING CHRISTIANITY) all the Bibles were edited.
2006-11-04 02:14:28 · answer #1 · answered by FI24nc|< 3 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Probably the Bible. It's not online and isn't readily available for instant abuse (sterling example: R&S forum).
At least the "inaccuracies" of the Bible are pretty static, and not like the dynamic inaccuracies of Wikipedia.
2006-11-04 10:23:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Koh-i-Noor is Koh-i-Noor, nothing can replace it. (if you don't know what is Kohinoor, Wikipedia will guide you). Bible and Wikipedia are two different type of sources that having accuracies and inaccuracies, so I cannot compare the both. Bible helps me to understand how to be a human being whereas Wikipedia helps me to understand my ignorance.
2006-11-04 10:44:12 · answer #3 · answered by cuckoo747 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually I think Yahoo Answers is more accurate and useful than the Bible or Wikipedia.
For example, I had a problem with my Jeep and I posted a question and got some great answers from experienced mechanics.
The Bible doesn't even mention Jeeps. In fact, Jesus didn't even have a ride. Otherwise, when they tried to crucify him, he could have just given them the finger and driven off to France with Mary Magdalene.
2006-11-04 10:25:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think the Holy Bible has had a lot more scrutiny for more than a millenium. Whereas wickedpaedia has been around, what, 3 years?
2006-11-04 10:24:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
i really like the problem you pose. hahaha. it's like asking who's right-- my mom or my teacher (something like that).
anyway, i still think it's an "apple/orange" question. the bible doesn't even teach me how to drive! and the wikipedia wasn't written for the purpose of propagating faith. both have their own truths and applications. i'd read the bible for inspiration. i'd consult the wikipedia for stem cell research updates.
i love my mom. i respect my teacher. both went through college, and both have their lines of expertise.
i hope this sheds some perspective. best wishes.
2006-11-04 10:32:11 · answer #6 · answered by doe 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey jibba! I cant believe people actually said the bible! The bible did not fall from the sky and people think its actually GOds word when man wrote the bible and it has gone through so many hands over thousands of years and can easily have been changed.
2006-11-04 10:31:00 · answer #7 · answered by daisy322_98 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I will have to read wikipedia completely before I can answer you
2006-11-04 10:16:10 · answer #8 · answered by inin 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Jibba I would have to say because they are words defined by mans limited comprehension. And the definition of words change according to the times of man. Words are meaningless.
I wish you well.
2006-11-04 10:23:45 · answer #9 · answered by fryedaddy 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Both are innaccurate, but Wikipedia is at least based on factual material.
2006-11-04 10:17:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋