I'm probably more of an agnostic...though I think I think like an atheist. There is just enough evidence *for* every major religion and every major god that leads me to suspect they are all equally either true or false. People just seem to have a much easier time accepting "I think they're all equally false" than they do "I think they're all equally true"...which is probably closer to what I believe, but as to why that's less acceptable, I know not.
For me, mostly research. More philosophy than science--as anyone who reads my answers a lot knows, Feuerbach was a major influence on me (and that also comes from being an anthropology type). I was raised in the Christian church, but when I couldn't get my questions answered there, I turned elsewhere. That research led me to where I am today.
2006-11-04 02:23:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by angk 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is from knowing how things work in a PROVEN SCIENTIFIC way.
IT is also because I, personally, do not and will not devote my whole life to something I can not measure and test.
I can believe that there is some sort of higher power, but I trust the it is more likely in some energy force within the cosmos IF ANYTHING.
I guess that does not make me an atheist though, does it?
I hate the way you say "I wish you well" as though you are already criticizing what people will say as a rebuttal BEFORE they even say it.
2006-11-04 10:03:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by J. P 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Reading the Bible is a good start - and then the Problem of Evil leaves out without either an all-powerful God, or an all-loving God (they are mutually exclusive when taken in context with our world).
2006-11-04 10:19:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that most people find it out as a way to be original ( young people ) or just don't like when somebody is telling them "This is the ultimate truth and you can't change it". I don't think of myself as atheist, i have my own little religion - I believe that there is something "big and powerful, maybe almighty" but i dunno if it's Jawed, Jah, Buddha, Christ, Satan or whatever. There are to many religions to tell which is true ( establishing that one of them is ). My opinion is:
- something created everything ( sounds cool )
- there must be reason why we are so inteligent, ewolution would made horses, camels and pandas talk like us.
Sorry if i made grammar mistakes - My English isn't perfect.
2006-11-04 10:14:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by busta_grip 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Education and a lack of evidence for any gods. I'm also glad I'm not associated with the people who call themselves believers these days. Spiteful, corrupt, dishonest and hypocritcal.
2006-11-04 10:14:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The non-existence of something results in the non-existence of any evidence supporting the existence of that something.
Therefore it would be more a case of the LACK of something leading to the conclusion that god is a construct of people who don't think rationally.
2006-11-04 10:02:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Phil O' Brien 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
It became evident in my education that MAN created GOD. Don't you think so? Really? What good has come of it? Religious wars? Terrorism? Hate?
2006-11-04 10:04:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by janeinthecity_1999 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Education, but I do believe in a God, I just dont know what that is yet
2006-11-04 09:59:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sean 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Common sense.
2006-11-04 10:00:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just boredom with church.
I wasn't something that I could be positive about, but something that I could ignore.
2006-11-04 10:05:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋