We are constantly being bombarded by media reports of "2 dead". "16 dead". "60 dead"."Mass graves being found" "Total of over 650,000 dead etc
Why is it that the order to release a neutron bomb - even though it may kill 500,000 in a single day - has not been given after a 48hr Notice to Leave the area is issued?
Yes there will be mega media coverage. Yes there may be outrage.
However, this constant daily depressive media reporting will not churn up divided loyalties - which in a time of conflict should be united behind each and everyone of our Troops.
Bullies need to be dealt with. Terrorists need to be dealt with in the only way they understand - and our Troops are well trained to be the ones to deal with them !
Tying our Troops hands behind thier backs to comply with "rules of engagement" HAS to be more flexible to deal with terrorists. - who have NO rules book !
2006-11-03 22:20:46 · 5 answers · asked by Hello 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
PLEASE NOTE - BEFORE any order was given to fire a neutron bomb, a 48 HOUR NOTICE TO LEAVE THE AREA would be given.... as I said in my question above !
2006-11-03 22:32:02 · update #1
A neutron bomb would allow Iraqi or Afghan people who chose to leave to return to thier country, as the buildings would not be affected - as I understand the effects of a neutron bomb !
2006-11-03 22:33:44 · update #2
How many American people think, or believe it is thier country who are fighting this war by themselves? Judging by the replies I'm becoming quite concerned that this may be the case...
I am mindful that it was the leader of USA who approached the leader of UK and NATO to ask for help in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflict... Mind you, I COULD be mistaken....???
2006-11-04 00:20:13 · update #3
For the benefit of clarification - when I say we should support each and everyone of our troops sent in to do a job politicians failed to do thru diplomacy, I of course mean Nato; U.S. and British troops !
2006-11-04 00:28:36 · update #4
So you are going to give the people 48 hours? are you going to add a note to the notice saying, " if you are a bad guy or think you may be a bad guy or have any intention to harm the US or its people please disregard this notice."
C'mon...you are talking about nuclear warfare...I don't care how you cut it...it makes us worse than the terrorists that we spent so much time trying to demonize.
Now I am glad you are not running the country...how's that for an insult...you actually make me feel better that G. W. is in office.
2006-11-03 23:20:29 · answer #1 · answered by silverback487 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think the problem is much easier to be solved. Eventually all the people on this earth will ruin this earth, either by being in war, or waging war somewhere else, or ruining the environment. Why not nuke the whole world? That way ALL media coverage will be gone, no people will fight or pollute or otherwise compromise the world anymore. Your idea has the flaw in it, that it does not cover enough of the population, so there would always be people left to whine and complain.
Added:
Oh and maybe you could be so kind as to tell us where the people have to go in 48 hours? They have to be put in refugee camps since their homes have been nuked. Maybe a nice educational program would be in order to learn these people that their homes have been nuked for a better world order, where everyone is nice to each other. If you don't these camps will probably be a perfect breeding ground for more terrorism. I'd appreciate your ideas on this.
Added:
Might I remind you that the NATO did not give consent to the war in Iraq, because the 'proof' that was given was not quite reliable? This war was wrong from the beginning, GWB has made a big mistake, and the only thing that speaks for him now, is that he takes the responsibility *not* to back out of it
2006-11-04 06:32:54 · answer #2 · answered by Jaco K 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You are like, totally ignorant about what your subject. Using ANY Nuclear device without the implicit consent of the other Nuclear-armed nations would set us right back into a cold war, or worse, with a lot more countries than just Russia on the other side!
2006-11-04 06:35:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Couldn't we just give the U.K PM 24 hours Notice to get out of Downing Street and Bomb it.
2006-11-04 12:06:40 · answer #4 · answered by bfpoonline 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
where do we stop? there are bullies all throughout our world...which is next? who decides? Bush? he blew Afghanistan...then invaded Iraq evidently on a vendetta...blew that as well....wouldn't it have been nice to finish the job in Afghanistan before spreading our troops so dangerously thin... and privatize so many previously military jobs for Halliburton and KBR to enable the CEO of Halliburton to have made 100 million in the last few years in stock profits...since their no bid no limit contracts are not even seriously audited.....
2006-11-04 08:07:39 · answer #5 · answered by chiefof nothing 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋