that does'nt have roots, that did'nt have a maker? If everything was a reaction or a result of something else, why would existence be any different?
2006-11-03 16:40:40 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Who said everything is a reaction ? maybe the universe has no logic nor reason and we think by our own human mind that the universe has the same characteristics that we have .. Isnt it logic and reason that block our understanding of what is around us , because what is around us isnt following the pattern of logic and reason alone nor could be explained by them only. .And what if the universe is nothing but a big hallucination from our complex mind?
2006-11-03 16:52:17 · answer #1 · answered by fuschiafish 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Look, your argument is basically just an argument from ignorance. You point out something for which we don't have a definite answer, and then say "Aha! God did it!". You then use that as a basic to make all sorts of unsubstantiated claims about what properties this God has. You jump to the conclusion that a 3000 year old book is an accurate description of how the universe came to exist, just because it claims to be the "word" of this God. Yet the book is full of factual errors about the earth and the universe, and it describes a God who condoned slavery and stoning people to death for working on Sundays.
I'd rather admit that there are questions that we can't yet answer, and not be blinded by faith.
2006-11-03 17:02:14 · answer #2 · answered by Jim L 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, we can.
The infinite number of virtual particles that spring into existence and immediately flash back out purely as a consequence of quantum randomness. They don't come into existence for a reason -- they are purely random. They flash back out of existence by self-annihilation purely by symmetry.
Oh, and it's those very types of quantum fluctuations in the universe that gave rise to the inflationary era that began our visible portion of the universe.
2006-11-03 16:44:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Everything in the "physical" world can be named scientifically since theoretically speaking, there is a reason behind all actions in the universe. Only spiritual matters cannot be explained and named scientifically because it is beyond its realm.
2006-11-03 16:57:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I can name a thing that doesn't have a purpose or a reason. Fleas. They aren't a food to anything, and they are just there to annoy people and animals. They serve no purpose on the earth but to annoy. Life deosn't have to have a reason to exist, it just does.
2006-11-03 16:45:49 · answer #5 · answered by NightTrainWooWoo 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The 'creation' of 'god'...assuming there is such a thing...where did THAT come from.......I think 'random particles' are probably explainable once scientists discover that the 'big bang' itself is 'relative' and that it is only JUST about to happen.
2006-11-03 16:44:26 · answer #6 · answered by markus 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Scientifically, I wouldn't even be talking about a "maker" the way you are.
2006-11-03 16:42:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
no, i believe everything created in this world/universe has a reason.
2006-11-05 07:54:26 · answer #8 · answered by Meow~ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the universe is a proccess, it needs no reason.
2006-11-03 16:44:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, thats true....
2006-11-04 02:40:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋