If 89 % of Mexicans think Bush was unjustified to go into Iraq how on earth could Bush have been wrong?

Question

British and Canadians weern't to far behind them. First Canadians what do they know ice hockey and cold weather in that order. The English they dont want to fight untill they start dropping 500 pound bombs on their cities. When everyone says your wrong. Bet your bottom dollar that you are right. You want to critasise a Bush do it to senior for not doing the job right the first time. Then we wouldn't be in there in the first place.

Answer 1

WHAT PERCENT OF THE LIBERALS BELIEVE THIS?::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.We want to
show, one way
or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass
destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President
Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
usly diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." -
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Iraq is a long way from here, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the
risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons
against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18,
1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." -
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution
and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on
suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl
Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9,1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction
technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and
palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports
indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to
pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is
doubtless using the cover of an illicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that
will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bus h, Signed by Sen.
Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace
and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations. "We have
known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass
destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter
and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore,
Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons
of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen.
Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop
nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also
should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in
development of weapons of mass destruction."- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10,
2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN
resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological
weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D,
CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein
has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery
capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam
Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and
will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10,
2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has,
and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of
weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-if
necessary-to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of
mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F.
Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator,
leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so
consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response toJohn F. Kerry
(D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction... So theJohn F. Kerry
(D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real" - Sen. John F. Kerry
(D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
Source(s):
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Answer 2

There is no reason for us to be in Iraq. Not one. Every single excuse that I've heard, there is another country that would have been more logical to invade. When the rest of the world is shaking their head you know that A) you've messed up your future relationship with the rest of the world, and B) you probably made a mistake.

Answer 3

Part of being intelligent is to listen to others comment about your behavior as they might be right and you might learn something about yourself. US behavior has been criticized by a vast majority of the people of the world, includng many of our friends, and it would do us good to listen. We say we are doing it for the common good. If the response is that what we are doing is not for their "good," then perhaps we are wrong in some of our behavior. Are we too strong to listen to others, are they all wrong?

Answer 4

properly, a minimum of you at the instant know that the drug cartels are being supported by skill of the U. S. dollar. Who does Bush think of runs the medicine in Mexico, duh? the government! I inform you, the U. S. government is this style of whooz. i'm Mexican and that i know the place that money is going. there is no longer battling drugs in Mexico, that's what's protecting it alive. occasion: i know of a Drug King Pin that served 7 years in a US reformatory for money laundering (because of the fact they could no longer get him on something) and while he replaced into deported, interior a month or so, he replaced into the supervisor of police in a border city in Sonora. on the instant, he's even a director of police for many small cities on the brink of the border. the place's the guy inquiring for the Senate or domicile vote on that, and calling your Senator or domicile to vote no on giving Mexico money to combat the war on drugs. this is an countless war without effective consequence. the only thank you to win the war on drugs if for US voters to provide up utilising. No call for - no product.

Answer 5

Judging by your name, "the truth as I see it, so it is," kinda says it all. Why ask such questions when you think you are already right! To pose such a serious question and be taken seriously, you MUST: a) spell correctly and b) not be so biased. Your comments about Canadians alone shows just how closed minded you are.

Answer 6

Shouldn't it be more telling what the US thinks? What does it matter what the bordering countries think when we now have the entire Middle East hating us?

Answer 7

Yes im sure that you are much smarter than millions of people in countries with better education systems.

Answer 8

Most of the world thinks he was wrong and he is looking for the exit.

Answer 9

How many attacks have been on the U.S. since we invaded Iraq?

Answer 10

Why is it that Mexicans get a say in this.Honestly why do they always get a say in everything.

Answer 11

Just one Bush is Rite and every one else is wrong? that is democracy