crash test dummies are v v v v expensive and it seems to me we could benefit science and medecine using much more cost efective methords
2006-11-03 01:55:52 · 56 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
NO SEAT BELTS OR HELMETS. RIGHT?
2006-11-03 01:58:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Taking a human life no matter what they are, is wrong. Causing suffering to another being is wrong. My children were assaulted when they were young but I would never want to see the persons who did it hurt in any way. They are already hurting and this shows by what they have done. But what sort of person would it make me is I were to cause them to suffer more than they humanely need to. I do not agree with what they do but I dont think using them as crash dummies is a good idea either. They need help of some sort.
If we were to start this sort of thing would that include rapists, murderers, thieves, etc etc what a horrid world we live in.
2006-11-03 02:15:10 · answer #2 · answered by citta_uk 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And - - - when you've all done all those justifiably indignant, angry and vengeful things to those men and women. When all the dust from those crashes, bombs and so on has settled. When evidence "comes to light" - as it all too often does - that amongst those men and women that you have so "rightfully" butchered were those who, in fact, were not guilty. What then??? Will you be so keen to form a queue to apologise to their families and friends??? Will you dip into your own pockets to offer an unwanted compensation, when all those people want is their dead innocent amongst them?? Will you explain how you killed them to their children?? Will you cry?
2006-11-06 15:08:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if they are intact after the test.
I think they should be used only in tests with speeds over 100mph on a standing object (something that explodes would be nice).
Try it with Micheal Jackson first.
Then Gary Glitter.
Then with the rest of the crooks.
Burn Baby Burn
2006-11-06 22:32:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is an excellent idea. But why not use the dummies on death row too - it costs tax payers tons of money to kill them in a humane way. I say you have one heck of an idea - shoot this question to congress (by the way there are a few politicians that could handle the crash dummie job just as well.)
2006-11-03 02:06:50 · answer #5 · answered by Jazz 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
India had a near perfect match after Australia's first innings batting,i thought it was good first innings from Aussies but India scored so fast thanks to Dhawan and co and Australia's second innings capitulation that happened so quickly on the last day cannot be explained even by Ian Chappell.Batting for India clicked so well in this series,they had a near perfect match.Australia should've drawn this match but they ended up losing on the last day thanks to some poor batting in second innings.
2016-03-28 05:37:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think a lot of people would be in favour of this... personally I would like to see the law changed so they get harsher sentences, even for those that download images. I would also like to see the big computer companies find a programme to monitor and track them. Do we not have the technology for this... I think we do, if we can track a human being from space surely we can track a disgusting paedophile.
2006-11-03 04:58:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Great idea. Not just crash test dummies, but also as "guinea pigs" for testing out new medicines, and using them for laboratory testing and experiments instead of testing on innocent animals. This wouldn't only be the perfect solution, but also the perfect deterrent.
2006-11-03 05:45:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hmmm...I get your point, but I don't see how there should be any connection betwen the morality (or otherwise) of something and cost effectiveness...
But if you made it a "life in an open prison [probably short] or do three crash tests" kind of proposition you might get some takers...
Hopefully...
2006-11-03 02:07:43 · answer #9 · answered by Apollonia 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No because as with all executions there always a reasonable chance they were wrongly convicted (especially if you're poor, black and live in the USA). Mind you, not that i wouldn't mind hearing that Ian Huntley had a serious shaving accident. I guess i'm just a confused being, cannot make up my mind.
2006-11-03 02:13:55 · answer #10 · answered by Nikita21 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They did used to use real cadavers as crash test dummies. I think your suggestion is the natural progression from that and it will give the paedophiles live some meaning.
2006-11-03 01:59:39 · answer #11 · answered by RRM 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋