"Creation has NEVER been proven wrong and evolution has NEVER been proven right!"
This is actually true, but creationism has never been proven right either, and evolution has never been proven wrong . So what the point in saying it?
2006-11-03 01:47:33 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If anyone uses this argument to answer this question I will be laughing out loud so feel free ;)
2006-11-03 01:49:12 · update #1
Oh yeah, one last thing, no quoting scripture as proof. See my previous question as to why you do this -> http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20061103033958AA5khhM&r=w
2006-11-03 01:49:51 · update #2
Btw: I don't hate God. I don't believe that he's even there. Why hate something you don't believe in? It's like saying someone hates ghosts because they don't believe in the.
2006-11-03 01:51:42 · update #3
The last resort of a losing side. If you can't PROVE your side, at least tear down the other side.
2006-11-03 01:49:21 · answer #1 · answered by Black Parade Billie 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
It illustrates the level of their argument. Most respectable Creationists (if there is such a thing) wouldn't use that quote as it is completely pointless.
A lot of the so called Creationists that use Answers have a very limited knowledge of the argument and come out with a lot of incorrect arguments, there is actually a very good article on www.answersingenesis.com in which a large Creationist organisation outlines which arguments should be used. Find it at: http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dont_use.asp
Perhaps a few more people should read it and stop wasting the Evolutionist's time asking outdated and false questions!
2006-11-03 02:00:30 · answer #2 · answered by Batgirl182 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Some things will be a mystery until the end of time. Then the truth will be known.
How can you explain the complexity of the world as an accident.
Look around a question why plants give off the oxygen we need and we supply CO2 for them. Why are we the only beings that are like we are. Why didn't evolution of some other species happen at the same time. Look at the night sky, all those stars are the result of something.
Any scientist will tell you, you can't get something from nothing, zero will always get zero, and with that, explain the universe and the Earth.
2006-11-03 02:00:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Organisms either appeared on the earth fully developed or they did not. If they did not, they must have developed from pre-existing species by some process of modification. If they did appear in a fully developed state, they must have been created by some omnipotent intelligence.
"It was because Darwinian theory broke man's link with God and set him adrift in a cosmos without purpose or end that its impact was so fundamental. No other intellectual revolution in modern times . . so profoundly affected the way men viewed themselves and their place in the universe."—*Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (1985), p. 67 [Australian molecular biologist].
"When Darwin presented a paper [with Alfred Wallace] to the Linnean Society in 1858, a Professor Haugton of Dublin remarked, `All that was new was false, and what was true was old.' This, we think, will be the final verdict on the matter, the epitaph on Darwinism."—*Fred Hoyle and N. Chandra Wickramasinghe, Evolution from Space (1991), p. 159.
"My attempts to demonstrate evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed. At least I should hardly be accused of having started from any preconceived anti-evolutionary standpoint."—*H. Nilsson, Synthetic Speciation (1973), p. 31.
2006-11-03 02:01:42 · answer #4 · answered by heresyhunter@sbcglobal.net 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i think of the scientists that creationists communicate with are people who've reported that the %. of eveolution has been swifter than modern fashions might are watching for. some non secular yet liberal and evolutionist scientists have asked no depend if this speed ought to be defined by way of a benign tension 'encouraging the cube'. recent genetic advancements demonstrate an developed blueprint (uncomplicated form that stys the comparable for the period of long sessions of mutation) which could clarify the fee of evolution even nevertheless.
2016-12-09 01:50:54 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People shouldn't say that, it's just not true. The fact is, none of us were there for the beginning of the universe so we will probably never know, at least until we die.
Some evolutionists use the same argument though.
One problem is that two different scientists can analyze the same piece of evidence, and come up with totally opposite conclusions. I hope people will search for the truth, not just try to prove their theory correct.
2006-11-03 01:58:45 · answer #6 · answered by bandit 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hi,
Try "Rational Spirituality". It is the thinking person's concept of God and the Universe, that perfectly combines creationism with evolutionism, in total harmony. It is the only concept of its kind.
2006-11-03 02:07:31 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because many Evolutionists feel that it has been proven.
You are the exception. They don't believe it is a theory. The believe it is written in stone without so much as a blemish or crack.
They have MORE FAITH in Evolution than many Christians have in the Bible.
2006-11-03 01:54:24 · answer #8 · answered by Salami and Orange Juice 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
After 3000 years of "trying"
NOBODY KNOWS Anything ...
The Media "required" an answer .....
so there was a STATEMENT
Have patience , all will be REVEALED
in the year 2525 !
2006-11-03 02:07:30 · answer #9 · answered by Moonlite gambler 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Empty rhetoric. When logic fails, turns to confusion and appeal to the emotions.
2006-11-03 02:20:35 · answer #10 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋