English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It was recently reported on the news that there was a court case regarding the use of civilians for catching people speeding and the legalities of civilians carrying this out on behalf of the police. Does anyone know the outcome of this or is it still ongoing?

2006-11-03 00:10:08 · 4 answers · asked by gmcb_1 2 in Cars & Transportation Safety

4 answers

I have read of studies that show speed cameras raise city revenue and are likely to cause more accidents.

2006-11-03 00:21:17 · answer #1 · answered by Paul K 6 · 0 0

i do not keep in mind the case of the ambulance motive force, yet he became in basic terms an ambulance motive force, not a policeman. The police seem thoroughly above the regulation. after all, in the adventure that they could shoot an unarmed guy on the tube, and then lie about it and not in any respect something takes position, what's quite speeding? If the police can't obey the regulation, why might want to all and assorted? is this THE CASE YOU recommend? there have been others. Ambulance motive force receives speed high quality An ambulance agency that provides you with organs for transplant claims a police pressure is refusing to quash a speeding high quality after a motive force became stuck by technique of a speed digicam. M&L Ambulance provider, a private London agency, suggested Thames Valley Police became refusing to waiver Lee Schramm's £60 high quality and three factors on his licence. Mr Schramm became utilising at 36mph in a 30mph zone in London highway, Oxford. A police spokesman suggested that they had not heard from the agency to describe that Mr Schramm became on an emergency call. My managers were in contact with police and they have not waived it in any respect M&L Ambulance provider spokesman He suggested all registered motorized vehicle owners are despatched a comprehend meant Prosecution if their motorized vehicle is stuck being pushed too quick. Fines and factors are then annulled if the adventure became an emergency. an organization has 28 days to inform police till now a prosecution is released. The spokesman informed the BBC information information superhighway website that video pictures from the digicam confirmed Mr Schramm did not have the motorized vehicle's blue lights on, so confirmation became had to teach he became on an emergency call. Mr Schramm became utilising a Ford Mondeo property small inner most ambulance to furnish organs from Gatwick Airport to Churchill clinical institution, Oxford, even as he became stuck by technique of the digicam. A spokesman for M&L Ambulance provider informed the BBC information information superhighway website it had contacted police yet that the high quality and factors had not been quashed. He suggested: "My managers were in contact with police and they have not waived it in any respect." The police spokesman further it became in all chance that the count number might want to be resolved if M&L Ambulances provider presented the necessary guidance. FROM BBCNews very last as a lot as date: Tuesday, 20 December 2005, 11:fifty 8 GMT

2016-12-05 12:08:43 · answer #2 · answered by hamiton 4 · 0 0

Apparrently it is going to be tried out. Personally I think its wrong, I think the police should do what they are paid to do and not cut costs by allowing volunteers or civilian staff to do their work for them once again cutting costs

Where are the police? in our area they are virtually invisible!!

2006-11-03 12:02:27 · answer #3 · answered by Iluvewomen 2 · 0 0

If this was regarding informing the revenue collectors who was driving, then the decision was deferred, and should be resolved (If i remember correctly) November 11th?

2006-11-03 00:41:34 · answer #4 · answered by World Wise 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers