In terms of physical geography, no. Australia is its own continent.
In terms of culture, no. While Asian immigration is increasing, most Australians are still descended from Europeans, particularly British ancestors.
In terms of politics and the global economy, Australia does play an important role in the Pacific Rim, but it is still not part of Asia. Some folks may lump Australia, New Zealand, and the thousands of islands of the Pacific with Asia into one, Asia-Pacific category, but that's a group which is too broad to be useful.
For one thing, if you're talking about Asians, you're already talking about most of the people in the world. The combined populations of Australia, New Zealand, Polynesia, Micronesia, and Melanesia are only a small percentage of the population of China, for instance.
2006-11-02 20:48:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Beckee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not it's not..
Because australia is a continent but also a country
so we can't say australia is asia's country since asia's country is refer to country which located in asia continent.
2006-11-02 20:48:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by angel_arrow 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, Australia is not included in Asia. It is for away from Asia.
http://www.geocities.com/gopi2net
2006-11-02 20:47:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have diferrent continent. Asia is one and the other is Australia. So, Australia is not part of Asia. They are Continents.
2006-11-02 23:48:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by karenj627 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to the CIA, it's classified as located within 'Oceania', which excludes nearly all of Asia.
According to the BBC & quite possibly the government of Britain, it's part of the Asia-Pacific part of the world.
It is really dependent upon who you ask--it's either Oceania or Asia-Pacific.
2006-11-02 20:38:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by monica_crss 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i like the belief even nonetheless I relatively have pessimism with Asian countries yet no longer with Australian and New Zealand. relatively, the financial equipment of jap eu countries have been recovering very speedy after transforming into a member of eu Union. And we are able to work out that euro is extra ideal against US dollar. on an identical time, the mobility of jap europeans to the crucial and west eu countries have been increasing that deliver competitiveness. ok, then for Asia-Pacific Union case, in case you % to incorporate India, then we ought to consistently incorporate China, Japan and South Korea. in actual fact i think of Asian countries are majority nonetheless in massive mess to be united in governance-smart like eu Union. maximum of them weren't respecting human rights, intense sort of corruptions with vulnerable regulation enforcement, particularly having vulnerable defense force defence, too nationalistic, and espresso point human progression. And understanding the prevalent of Indonesian parlement contributors, i've got self belief that no person ought to have any of them to be in Asia-Pacific Parliamentary Union (if there will be ;)). in spite of the undeniable fact that, needless to say no longer something is impossible as long as those Asian countries might % to artwork it out. yet initially, they should know human rights and renowned the rights of their voters to have secure and equality in all component. in accordance to me it could take even extra desirable than 20 years to advance that...
2016-11-27 00:58:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope... its not... its include in australia continent... asia is another continent
2006-11-03 23:56:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kate 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
politically yes but geographically it is part of the pacific.
2006-11-06 18:15:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-11-04 03:34:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-11-02 20:58:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by orang utan35 1
·
0⤊
0⤋