English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i have researched well into this russian made missle system, its the only one of its kind in the world, far superior then the american patriot system, the range of the russian system is far greater and hit probabilty allmost 90 per cent,it can track over 20 different targets at once.the maerican patriot has a hit probabilty of 5 per cent as proved in the first gulf war against scud missles.once the triumph locks onto it's target and fired the target whether its a cruise missle, ballistic missle or any jet fighter is doomed.

2006-11-02 18:50:55 · 9 answers · asked by the _reporter 2 in Politics & Government Military

9 answers

nope, i have heard and read a few articles on this and there are no matching missle systems in the world,nothing can get past it as far as i know.

2006-11-02 19:11:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This system looks much more capable than comparable US systems, which shouldn't be too suprising since most US systems were developed in the 60s and early 70s. I will tell you though, that most western countries don't send lone fighter aircraft or launch lone missiles.

Additionally, it is rated to defeat TBM threats of up to 3500 kms, and the US has many many missiles with greater range than that (and it is not range that is as important as closing velocity and radar cross section anyway). Remember Gulf War patriots were meant to shoot airplanes, they were just effective enough to be able to his missiles. This weapon system is designed to hit multiple threats, including missiles. Most people will confirm for you that this system would be highly ineffective if used alone. If all that stands between a Russian target and a US arial attack platform is a Triumph-S 400, the Triumph would lose.

Even if a part of a tiered layer of defense, the US has space intercept assets and the Russians don't. This system relies heavily on Active Radar Terminal Homing, which means, without space intercept assets, it would be an easy system for the US to defeat with ballistic missiles.

I think this system is more an "anti-AWACS" and "anti-Tomohawk" system with BMD capability than the ultimate in Air Defense. Nations would want to buy this system because it provides several capabilities relatively cheaply, not because they believe it will defeat all known threats.

2006-11-02 20:27:12 · answer #2 · answered by Big Blair 4 · 0 0

Well....

The S-400 has only been inducted into the V V S (Russian airforce) only recently (January 2006). Therefore, I don't believe it hasn't been subjected enough to mock simulations enough to determine which ballistic missiles/jet fighters can evade (not avade) it. But there are a couple of indications. Naturally, aircrafts with low radar cross section (stealth aircraft) will have a better chance agains the S-400.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-400

2006-11-02 20:06:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

in easy terms a fool might think of that extra palms will resolve any subject, you should study extra. we've placed $2 hundred billion in Reagan's Laser "huge call Wars" application and it nevertheless does no longer artwork. 1200 scientist say that's going to on no account artwork. Israel has the main suitable palms interior the international, individuals paid for them, they are in a position to't provide up in coming missiles. Even our maximum suitable structures "patriots" omit 60 % of the time. North Korea is 10 years from achieving our shore and 5 years from putting a nuke on a rocket. If no one had nukes, no one might desire to spend Tax payer money to faux to take care of united statesa.. We spend $4 hundred billion a year now on protection and we can't even keep peace in Iraq, that's the dimensions of Texas.

2016-12-09 01:43:50 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well any system can be tricked so it not a matter of finding one that will get through it is a matter of altering what we have to make it through. Say an antimissile missile system on the plane to shoot down incoming missiles

2006-11-02 19:00:04 · answer #5 · answered by sphericaluniverse 2 · 0 0

WOW! Looks very impressive. Its good to see Russia back in the game again. I just hope they are careful who they sell them too. They are already selling them to China. Hopefully they will deploy them on the border of North Korea. They would make an awesome weapon to counter North Korea.

2006-11-02 20:27:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

At the risk of sounding ignorant, what does avade mean.?.?.

2006-11-02 19:00:57 · answer #7 · answered by eddie_schaap 4 · 0 0

The only real test of any weapon system is combat.

2006-11-02 18:53:44 · answer #8 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0 0

Yes ! It's TOP SECRET though !!!

2006-11-02 18:54:45 · answer #9 · answered by guraqt2me 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers