English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

please elaborate.

2006-11-02 17:14:12 · 5 answers · asked by kbraner 4 in Consumer Electronics Home Theater

5 answers

I would say DLP is far superior to LCD. On top of the motion problems with LCD you also have to contend with the "screen door effect." This is where you can actually see the the spaces between the pixels. DLP not only doesn't have this problem, but its pixels are actually so close together that it's almost impossible to tell where one ends and another begins, giving it a very smoth, film-like look.

Also while plasma and LCD are coming down in price, DLP is still much less expensive than either of those technologies.

Many detractors of DLP site potential for failure due to the fact that DLP has literally MILLIONS of moving parts. I have yet to see any evidence that DLP won't actually last longer than either of the other popular technologies.

DLP is an American technology developed right here by Texas Instruments.

When combining the clear performance advantages with the lower cost, DLP is the obvious choice.

2006-11-03 01:32:17 · answer #1 · answered by mrknositall 6 · 2 1

the motion problem in LCD screens has never been totally resolved, and for good reason, it's a physical limitation of the hardware. a typical TV screen or computer monitor that uses a CRT has phosphers on the screen that can turn on and off within a few nanoseconds, a LCD screen on the other hand uses two plates of glass with a liquid crystal substrate between them. when a LCD pixel is excited, it changes polarity and changes the light that shows through it. once an LCD is excited, it stays excited for one full cycle regardless of how long the power is applied. most LCD screens have refresh rates under 12ms...down to around 8. this is good for most television viewing, but, if you're watching something with a lot of motion, you will still get blur.

another limitaation of an LCD is that with the backlight and the fact it works on a principal of poliarized light, is that it cannot create a "true black" picture...the black will always have some light flowing through it.

DLP projectors on the other hand bounce light off millions of mirrors on a microchip. these mirrors react EXTREMELY fast, about as fast as a CRT or plasma (plasma works like LCD, except using liquid crystals and polarized light, it uses gas sandwiched between two pieces of glass...almost similar to a neon light). the newer units have improved over the older ones and no longer have the "rainbow effect" caused by moving an object across the screen fast enough to not keep up with the color wheel in front of the projector, they've replaced it with more responsive and longer lasting LED's.

personally, i say for ANY TV, your best bet is a DLP. The picture quality the sets last a bit longer than the other units onthe market.

2006-11-02 23:48:53 · answer #2 · answered by Jay Moore 5 · 1 0

lcd and Plasma are a thank you to circulate using fact they don't have the three drawbacks that projectors have. a million. Ambient mild kills front projection. you should be in a specified to or thoroughly dark room. Flat panel television's could be utilized in very almost any mild condition, different than direct sunlight. 2. Hidden expenditures - $3 hundred-$500 for lamp replacements which you are able to change each and every a million-2 years. upkeep and cleansing expenditures each and every few years counting on how dusty your atmosphere is. 3. setting up - with projectors, it incredibly is not any longer very practicaly to completely deploy it on a table. Projectors incredibly belong on the ceiling after which you are able to rigidity approximately ceiling mounts and wiring. it incredibly is a great worry. the only sturdy element approximately projectors is you may get a great image at a low value. till you like a reveal extra effective than 60", then persist with lcd or plasma.

2016-10-21 04:36:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Definitely get a LCD direct view. Projectors while bigger, suffer from poor view angle especially up/down. 37" have fallen below $1000 due to overcapacity from Korea and Taiwan. They are a bargain now especially considering that 6 months ago most were at the $1.8k level. The best lcd is still the sharp aquos. All the pixelation and motion blur of past sets are gone. They have several options at a 1080p (full HDTV resolution) with 5ms response time which has a stunning picture. It costs a little more but it's definitely worth it!

When you decide to buy, post whatever tv you want and make some money back at modoshi. If others buy, you'll make some extra.

http://www.modoshi.com/showcase.htm?ct=349&cs=Verified

2006-11-02 17:20:51 · answer #4 · answered by bobo 2 · 0 1

LCD direct view is almost always gives a better picture.
You really should take a look for yourself and go
down to your local electronics store and
compare the picture quality. Then
you will see which kind of TV
will best fit your likes
and pocket book.

H a p p y
H o m e
T h e a t e r i n g !

2006-11-03 10:44:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers