What'll we do if there are threats on multiple fronts that require swift deployment of vast numbers of troops?

Answer 1

Hmm lots of John Waynes and nukers here and I am glad there are still realists around.

I should assume the potential threats to be :
Iran - which will immediate compromise your military deployment in iraq and Afganistan,
Korea - where 50,000 American troops will need to be reinforced
from Japan
Taiwan - if China decide to lay claim finally

The US have the technological and military hardware for a short term response but will not withstand the attrition for the mid-term. There can't be nukes used in consideration of the neutral countries or reluctant allies.

When the trouble start, the US will not be able to last if China decide to swing in with the other sides.

Nothing you can do except surrender your overseas interests and like in isolation just like before Pearl Harbour. THE US will be impregnable once your military hardware is confined within your homeland.

Answer 2

US99.5 WUSN – Chicago site visitors congestion – Mile marker Taylor – chilly as you Artist – Thomas Rhett Trish’s – fowl tenders till now They were renowned – operating woman celeb Interview trivialities – huge Bang theory u . s . a . music – Curly Putnam leisure Video trivialities – leap First lines – Clammy fingers Get Your recreation On – would 14, 1986 teach Me the money – 6.4 cents A Stoddard Presentation – Amazon daily Dose Video trivialities – Lunch Dentist trivialities – Gingivitis Diabetes trivialities – Dry mouth leisure Zone – Jaws go in the back of the scenes on the 2013 Billboa – MGM Grand It’s a secret – Amelia Grace Justin Bieber Booed at Billboard music A - Ring existence of the wealthy and renowned – Watertown human beings trivialities – Gums Smile trivialities – good oral well being on the instantaneous In heritage – The pink go video clips gone Wild – Stephanie international's Tallest luxury Housing: upward push of - Miami $100 ninety Million property: us of a's New maximum - Greenwich

Answer 3

hmmmmmmmmm ......what the heck do we have all those nukes for ,if not to keep the wolves at bay,and if it ever comes to that ''deploying on several fronts''then quality not quantity..will rule the day...meaning technology will make the difference....mass battles are a thing of the past.swift decisive strikes are what counts tday...just ask any terrorist

Answer 4

That depends upon a lot of things. Most countries take a while to respond. The bigger ones usually take longer.

What country/region are you talking about?

Answer 5

We would just lose another war - like what we are going in Afghanistan and Iraq now.

Unfortunately!

Remember what General George C. Custer did when he was in the same boat?

And remember what his famous last words were?

"Holy Mackeral!!!!! Look at all of those ******* Indians!!!!

Answer 6

Well, Bush is making the same mistake as Hitler: Losing a war on 2 fronts (Afghanistan and Iraq).

Answer 7

call in the marines, they can be anywhere in the world ready to fight in a matter of 96 hours.

Answer 8

Reinstate the draft

Answer 9

of course we will act. USA is getting their paranoia get to them, with their "security after the terroirist attacks" it went out of control.

Answer 10

We will swifty deploy troops. and if needed civilians will take up arms.