Remember: NO MORE WIRE HANGERS, EVER !
2006-11-02 13:52:10 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Parenting
I think most celebrities are shallow and lame, so I'd say they just do it for the good attention.
2006-11-02 13:55:17 · answer #1 · answered by Manx 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well since it seems that everytime a celebrity adopts a child it is shown on tv. I think they do this just for show. I mean, I wouldn't flaunt adopting to make me more popular..... so why would everyone else. There might be some who honestly do it to help the less fortunate, but most of it looks for show. Especially madonnas latest adoption.
2006-11-02 13:57:28 · answer #2 · answered by sleepyincarolina 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think of while Hillary Clinton tried to get a countrywide medicare plan by, some repubs supported it, and a few dems have been against, even nonetheless she actually had extra help from dems than repubs. some repubs might have felt afraid a democratic president might go away to great a legacy - can no longer have that! On the two components of the political fence, a great sort of rich people (no longer all) % to entice close directly to their wealth, they're so petrified of paying extra taxes they're going to vote against any social coverage. So i think of it comes down so plenty extra to difficulty-unfastened selfishness than politics. needless to say, the rich who've a stake in protecting issues the way they're, are waiting to pay out money to effect votes.. Then a great sort of political sheep who do no longer think of very deeply approximately politics tend to have self belief the line given them by skill of fascinated events, that social medicine is commencing off the door to socialism, and socialism is the subsequent step until now communism, then you definately might finally end up with a stalinist state!!!!! (i'm going to be exaggerating, yet no longer that plenty). so as this is the reason this is such an uphill conflict to get a medicare bill handed. it is going to take a great sort of perseverance and braveness to do it.
2016-11-27 00:34:13 · answer #3 · answered by cegla 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is a mixture of both. I don't think a celebrity and their publicist sit down and think about ways to make people like them... like oh hey, you should adopt a child because it makes you look good. Really? okay, is india okay?.... But as it becomes more and more popular many stars realize that A. It is very good press, B. It helps humanity without just giving large amounts of their money away and C. They can keep their perfect bodies and keep working, something a natural child may bring to a very abrupt end.
2006-11-02 13:58:08 · answer #4 · answered by manderstwin1 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe both. I genuinely think that Angelina Jolie cares for her kids. I also think Madonna does BUT I believe Madonna was motivated more by the wrong reasons. Publicity probably. Just my opinion.
2006-11-02 14:03:24 · answer #5 · answered by IMHO 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think both because Jolie has about 2 or 3 kids she adopted and she's in alot of magazines.
2006-11-02 14:05:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
In the case of Madonna, I honestly feel she cares about less fortunate people.
2006-11-02 13:57:48 · answer #7 · answered by osunumberonefan 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think they really care about children because after they adopt them they really do try to give them a good life....i think its nice...if you've got the money the houses...and ev erything else why not do it?
2006-11-02 14:00:40 · answer #8 · answered by cutenwild1769 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think celebs have the $ and its no hurt to their body. Its great that they are adopting children who need a parent.
2006-11-02 13:55:59 · answer #9 · answered by angelalovin2003 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really think that Angelina Jolie did it because she fell in love with both Maddox and with Zahara. But then again I am a member of TEAM JOLIE!!!!
I am not sure that Madonna didn't do it for publicity.
2006-11-02 14:11:35 · answer #10 · answered by LittleMermaid 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋