2006-11-02 13:03:36 · 9 answers · asked by bowwowzbabiigurl309 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
See one point of view at
2006-11-02 13:06:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
N Korea wanted to talk one on one with the US. Since that didn't work in the past ( N Korea duped the Clinton administration) Bush demanded that they engage in six party talks including countries from the region. China, S Korea and Japan. They refused and started firing off some dud nukes. Eventually they realized that Bush wasn't going to back down, and they have since agreed to the six party talks. Even so, The US and the UN will hold them to the sanctions levied against them after the tests.
2006-11-02 21:14:41 · answer #2 · answered by CHEVICK_1776 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
GWB is doing the best he can with the N.Korean problem. This is one of the most challenging problems for any president, that is, using diplomacy with a freak like Kim Jong Il.
GWB has done better than most presidents in working with this rogue country, because he doesn't reward them for their misdeeds. GWB is willing to withhold food, if necessary, from these beggars, in order to get them to the bargaining table.
Once again, N.Korea has agreed to six way talks, because of pressure brought to bear by China. It's way too early to get really optimistic because we've been hear before. Just the same, it's a baby step in the right direction. Let's keep our fingers crossed.
2006-11-02 21:29:27 · answer #3 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
msn.com has two very good articles, so try to see how having China on our side, and now North Korea wants to negotiate again because the money was frozen....yes money talks!..it always has.
Bush cautious on N. Korea nuke turnabout (11/1/06)
WASHINGTON - In a surprise turnabout, North Korea agreed Tuesday to return to six-nation disarmament talks just three weeks after rattling the world by conducting an atomic bomb test. The breakthrough came after pressure from China and a U.S. offer ...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15510639/
• Hirsh: Has America Lost Its Luck? (7 hours ago)
Now we face two serious rising threats, North Korea and Iran. And having squandered our attention, resources and prestige on a trumped-up threat, Iraq, we are simply too weak and friendless to confront them as they should be. That’s what I call bad ...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15530569/site/newsweek/?nav=slate
2006-11-02 21:14:26 · answer #4 · answered by May I help You? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Like I always say N.korea is a joke, dont worry about them, we can soo kick there *** and they know it, there just poor and pissed like a common thug, thell quit there crap when china slams a red star up there asses.
2006-11-02 21:30:42 · answer #5 · answered by 7am gangster 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Without much enthusiam since there is no oil in North Korea.
2006-11-03 02:49:04 · answer #6 · answered by SHIH TZU SAYS 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even though there are sanctions.....if they broke them what are we going to do?......Saddam broke them for 12 years before we kicked his @ss, and now all we get is no war for oil!
2006-11-02 21:27:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
he is probly handling it like he always does.
watch this it explains the whole basic of war. i hate war do you?
2006-11-02 21:12:04 · answer #8 · answered by hardbringer26 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
With sanctions.
2006-11-02 21:06:40 · answer #9 · answered by profile image 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋