Which person has more historical evidence of their existence: Jesus or Buddha?

Answer 1

Buddha.

Answer 2

Both existed. thats a truth.

if you compare, budha is greater than god. no god can stand before him. thats the kind of personality budha was. he knew what he spoke, everythng from his personal experience. kindness, love, compassion etc were really put practice first by budha. jesus had said the same things some 500 years later. it is a mere repetition of what budha said. jesus has no contribution of his own. thats the tragedy of christianity.

some christians claims all other religious personalities are a myth. that is a big lie which the church even today propogates.

consider this - how people joined christ as followers during his life. handful. probably those twelve fools who calls themselves the apostles.

look at budha - during his life time millions joined hands with him. ofcourse, budha was a prince, people loved him and most of them were knowledgeable so they accepted him and joined him instantly. that is a historical fact. hindus accept that part as many hindus accepted budhism during budha's lifetime itself.

that could lead to the theory that jesus was a creation of imagination of those apostles or whoever started christianity. now it is for the readers to decide and go whichever way they want to go. mere writing in a holy book will not suffice.

Answer 3

Refer to The Shroud of Turin and see the wounds Jesus offered to pay for our sins. Who gains by this--us. Who did our Presidents recognize as the Almighty Jesus or Buddha? We know where Jesus is from but who knows where and who Buddha originated.

Answer 4

Jesus, by far. However I believe Buddha existed too.

Answer 5

the easy shown actuality that interior 30 years of Lord Jesus' lack of life there have been many Jews prepared to die believing in Lord Jesus Christ. Nero replaced into killing Christians, blaming them for the hearth in Rome at sixty 4 ad. Why did particularly some Jews believe in Jesus Christ through very actuality the Son of God, as their own savior? I recommend the disciples were preaching in an same factors the position Lord Jesus replaced into appearing those miracles. If he did not carry out the miracles like they claimed, it would want to were truly common for the commonly used public to not believe and disprove it. There does not be lepers that were healed, human beings born blind who had their sight restored, human beings born who might want to not walk, who've been healed, and so on. If someone spent 3 years appearing many healings in each and each and every city, which includes my personal. It does not be very complicated to both encounter out inspite of if it really is actual or thoroughly faux. God's word is 100% precise guidance, and human beings does not have believed and be prepared to go by persecution from not in basic terms Romans, yet besides from different Pharisees.

Answer 6

both have lost of historical evidence of their existence, The Jewish People as a whole are great record keepers( not a racist statement) Hence the begats of Matthew. There is also much historical evidence to support the Bhudda's existence. However hitorically or not Bhudda stayed dead and buried.

Answer 7

Buddha. There is actual evidence to prove he lived (the calendar arguement is bs, considering the current BC/AD calendar wasn't even adopted on a widespread level until the 9th century, and contains math errors).

Answer 8

In one of the bible books it says that Jesus appeared to up wards of 500 people after he died to prove beyond any doubt he had been resurrected. No one has that kind of proof.
They say they believe in non violence but in cambodia where everyone is buddist they are quite vicious. There was a web site on Buddha and it was a real eye opener. The few country's they are in are very cruel and vicious;. I was suprised at there history because I thought they were non violent. It was terrible and said how awful a religion it was.

Answer 9

There is NONE for Jesus. I don't know about Buddha.

Answer 10

BUDDHA Hands down.