I would like some "inteligent" athiest teach me what the other posiblities are and why chirality does not disprove the spontanious life theroy...
"And if you are so intelligent to know about chirality, than you have to know that disproving one theory doesn't make the other one true. There are more than 2 solutions here, and there is more scientific proof for Evolution than for Intelligent Design"
2006-11-02 10:21:13 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Chirality doesn't make it hard. It makes it imposible for life to come about by spontanious means. I want to know what are the "other choices" I thought it was either Inteligent design or spontanious. What else could there be. The answerer that I quoted seems to think there is something else. So educate me. What is it?
2006-11-02 15:28:10 · update #1
No one has answered the question. I can't award any winner with what you people have said. Tell me there is no other possiblities if there are none. Tell me why chirality does or why chirality does not distroy the claim of spontanious life generation. If someone doesn't come through you will have to pick your own winner.... Jim
2006-11-03 00:13:52 · update #2
I was hopping one of you would come back aqnd add a real answer. I guess that isn't possible so. You guys go ahead and pick the best answer I don't thinki there is one. For those of you who reject God being there scientific evidence that He is there and is real seems to be too hard for you to believe. You would rather believe life can spring to life from nothing.. That good people requires way more faith than this simple christian can muster... Jim
2006-11-04 09:35:39 · update #3
o>K>...
2006-11-06 00:44:54 · answer #1 · answered by hunterman 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Actually scientists have already proved Darwin's Theory wrong. Read the books Forbidden Archeology and The Hidden History of the Human Race by Michael A. Cremo There is heaps of archaeological finding and scientific proof that human beings where way more advanced and intelligent millions of years ago, and they didn't look like monkeys. Also go to www.stephen-knapp.com the world relief network for universal truths
2006-11-02 18:30:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Chirality ah the left hand right hand molecules make it difficult for life to have ever evolved from the soup theory
2006-11-02 18:27:08 · answer #3 · answered by proscunio 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Uh. Yeah. Are you endeavoring to make a point? Cause you kinda missed the mark here.
Oh, unless you're offering this as praise for the one who answered? Because she is right.
2006-11-02 18:26:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's intelligence for ya.
2006-11-02 18:24:39 · answer #5 · answered by starrdevine 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
life is as a result of love not god.
2006-11-02 18:22:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
congrats. atleast they didnt call you stupid.
2006-11-02 18:28:53 · answer #7 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And?
2006-11-02 18:22:46 · answer #8 · answered by ....... 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋