I think the final count was 104. Some people blamed it on Ramadan, but I wouldn't be surprised if it drops once the elections are over. The terrorists have been known to ramp up hostilities to influence elections.
2006-11-02 02:45:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1/70 th of the Iwo Jima landing of WW2 ( over 7000 on Iwo Jima ) . Thats over 200 per day .
Viet Nam , Averaged 16 K.I.A. per day .
Iraq , less than 3 per day .
So , in a historical context , whats your point ?
2006-11-02 09:18:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Higher than an Old School Rambo movie.
2006-11-02 10:02:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by red skorpion 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Less then the number killed in Washington DC.
2006-11-02 09:05:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Curtis 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
As of yesterday it was 104.
2006-11-02 09:06:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Curious J. 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
It shouldn't be a body count. They are lives lost--people with names and families and friends. Please don't belittle them and the sacrifice they are making for you.
2006-11-02 09:17:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by heavnbound 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Too many. Lets call George Bush and find out, shall we?
2006-11-02 09:01:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bman 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I BELIEVE IT IS AROUND 100 TROOPS KILLED,AND NONE OF THEM WERE CHILDREN OF OUR COUNTRYS LEADERS. TOO BAD BUSHES DAUGHTERS AREN'T IN THE SERVICE AND IN IRAQ.
2006-11-02 09:04:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by crane1951@sbcglobal.net 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
it's obviously just a number to you.
2006-11-02 09:04:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ovrtaxed 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
whats your point??? it's a war dummy! people die
2006-11-02 10:00:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋