English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

I think the final count was 104. Some people blamed it on Ramadan, but I wouldn't be surprised if it drops once the elections are over. The terrorists have been known to ramp up hostilities to influence elections.

2006-11-02 02:45:21 · answer #1 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 0 0

1/70 th of the Iwo Jima landing of WW2 ( over 7000 on Iwo Jima ) . Thats over 200 per day .
Viet Nam , Averaged 16 K.I.A. per day .
Iraq , less than 3 per day .

So , in a historical context , whats your point ?

2006-11-02 09:18:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Higher than an Old School Rambo movie.

2006-11-02 10:02:17 · answer #3 · answered by red skorpion 3 · 0 0

Less then the number killed in Washington DC.

2006-11-02 09:05:14 · answer #4 · answered by Curtis 6 · 1 0

As of yesterday it was 104.

2006-11-02 09:06:47 · answer #5 · answered by Curious J. 5 · 2 0

It shouldn't be a body count. They are lives lost--people with names and families and friends. Please don't belittle them and the sacrifice they are making for you.

2006-11-02 09:17:36 · answer #6 · answered by heavnbound 4 · 1 0

Too many. Lets call George Bush and find out, shall we?

2006-11-02 09:01:41 · answer #7 · answered by Bman 3 · 0 1

I BELIEVE IT IS AROUND 100 TROOPS KILLED,AND NONE OF THEM WERE CHILDREN OF OUR COUNTRYS LEADERS. TOO BAD BUSHES DAUGHTERS AREN'T IN THE SERVICE AND IN IRAQ.

2006-11-02 09:04:15 · answer #8 · answered by crane1951@sbcglobal.net 4 · 0 1

it's obviously just a number to you.

2006-11-02 09:04:01 · answer #9 · answered by Ovrtaxed 4 · 1 0

whats your point??? it's a war dummy! people die

2006-11-02 10:00:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers