Lets put it this way:
When you both give and receive... that tends to harmonise best and give the most favourable results.
When you give but do not receive... as I tend to find myself... one tends to get lost in false hopes, lose the ability to reason effectively... and suffer certain degrees of psychological pain.
When you receive but do not give... well... doesn't much feel like anything if you're not aware. If you're aware but can't do anything about it then it could possibly result in guilt, if one feels such things. Then again if you're refusing to return love deliberately then presumably you'd have some sort of reason for doing it.... be that sadism, indifference or whatever. I've never been in this scenario, but I imagine its more comfortable than the opposite.
And naturally the state of neither giving nor receiving is fairly... default...
So aside from the mutual scenario.... out of the two exclusives, its better to receive than to give, psychologically speaking. Its much like blood.... Drink too much in and you might feel a bit sick, but pour too much out and you will die a painful death.
2006-11-01 22:38:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Giving love may be easier to be involved with than receiving love. I believe a balance of both giving and receiving is the best.
2006-11-01 22:30:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spiritoso 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
When it comes to caring for your neighbours needs, giving is a real Joy and u dont expect anything back. I feel like life has been good enough to me, so i m happy to return that by offering to others, cause joy and growth of others make me happy and the suffering of others hurts me, it is the ability of empathy. When it comes to close relationships though, love relationships, family relationships, close friendly relationships, it is a two way street. There is no real dilemma. The one who can ask can also give, and the one who doesnt ask or take is unwilling to give much usually. thats my experience. If someone is offering too much without response he is not giving purely out of love, but to ease his own emotional needs, out of guilt, shame, insecurity, etc, and that is a temporary relief, but doesnt work well in the long run.
2006-11-01 23:22:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Zoe 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Giving love = Both. Because when you give love, you receive love too.
2006-11-01 23:14:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pinar 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
in this instantaneous the ex-female could desire to circulate to her pal and locate out the reality. If she would have the ability to no longer then circulate to the source of the lie, the guy the ex-female acquaintances pal. If it replaced into fake the certainly everybody owes this dude ask for forgiveness. The dude could desire to circulate on besides if she might have pay attention to him interior the 1st place this would possibly not in any respect have long gone this some distance. She could desire to have know her acquaintances tells memories. Dude you probably did no longer something you deserve extra helpful. Your dealing cackling hens. Don`t supply her and something the best thing approximately doubt. circulate on am i able to know will ought to do extra helpful. massive lesson replaced into discovered by capacity of your ex. terrific of superb fortune. playstation : in case you circulate returned to her, you owe no apologizes.
2016-10-21 03:25:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In prison it is much better to give than to receive
2006-11-01 22:31:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Giving love. It gives you this warm feeling inside.
2006-11-01 22:29:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by nasturtium41 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
giving love is easy but getting is not easy but both are better in life.
2006-11-01 22:28:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bharathi 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
giving feels nice ... and once you give unconditionally , you will recieve more than you give naturally
so it is always a good start to give and then wait for results xx
2006-11-01 22:32:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Peace 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
giving
2006-11-01 22:27:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by I give you the Glory Father ! 6
·
0⤊
1⤋