2006-11-01 15:11:08 · 13 answers · asked by Steph :-) 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Jesus was fully human and fully God in ONE PERSON.
Jesus got his humanity from his mother.
Jesus shared his blood stream in the womb with his mother, just like any human being in the womb.
2006-11-01 15:30:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Jesus is not God’s Son in the sense of how we think of a father and a son. God did not get married and have a son. Jesus is God’s Son in the sense that He is God made manifest in human form (John 1:1,14). Jesus is God's Son in that He was conceived by the Holy Spirit. Luke 1:35 declares, "The angel answered, 'The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God.'" In Bible times, the phrase “son of man” was used to describe a human being. The son of a man is a man.
[ And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. ]
1 Timothy 3:16
2006-11-01 23:43:25 · answer #2 · answered by David 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God impregnated Mary with sperm and the sperm made her pregnant. He fertilized the egg just as sperm does when it is administered the regular way, only he didn't use anything physical to do it. It was a creative miracle sort of like making the world and humans from nothing. Since He created every atom in the universe He just created that substance by creating sperm atoms.He probably just spoke her pregnant and that was that. It don't sound to hard for me to understand with all I have learned about the Christ aspect of God.
2006-11-01 23:43:21 · answer #3 · answered by happylife22842 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No and Mary was not the first Virgin who had a child. 5,000 years a go and before it was more common because the angels use to visit here more often. Queen kunti was a 13 year old virgin and she had Karna who was put in her womb by an angel (dime-god) without touching her. Krishna who is God Himself was put into the whom of Deviki and When He appeared he was fully bedected with jewels and crown. They are all special cases but not cloning.
2006-11-01 23:23:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jesus was God made in the flesh so I belive but not 100% certain that Mary just carried Jesus
2006-11-01 23:13:52 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I got a better question. If god got Mary pregnant without out sex, what was he thinking? It's like throwing your desert on the ground so you can wash the plate. Give me any good reason to skip sex
2006-11-02 00:31:18 · answer #6 · answered by andersonspride 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's one way to look at it and it actually makes sense... i think we're suppose to think that either Jesus just is without any scientific explanation, or maybe that he did have mary's dna...
As soon as you learn that mary got pregnant without sex you have to assume that the rest of it doesn't have an explanation either
2006-11-01 23:14:23 · answer #7 · answered by sadgreeneyes3 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Possibly, there is a thought that he was actually the Resurrection of Adam. The Alfa and Omega, the first and the last. Adams body was taken aboard Noahs Ark and then reburied after the flood.
2006-11-01 23:14:39 · answer #8 · answered by Sean 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. He got all of his flesh from Mary. He must have looked alot like her.
2006-11-01 23:33:19 · answer #9 · answered by Midge 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Interesting theory????? Do you want to be a geneticist?(i'm being sincere and not snotty, seriously, good question). Holy crap, that's some awesome thinking!!!! Sounds good to me!!!
2006-11-01 23:14:37 · answer #10 · answered by C 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋