i would.
and by not teaching anything..
theres a big chance of atheism.
edit:
yepp. what im trying to say is..
what the ppl below me are saying.
2006-11-01 14:21:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by uhohspaghettiohohs 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Atheism is not a religion. It is common sense and logic. We should all teach our children critical thinking skills so that they can better deal with the world.
That said, I don't have a problem with parents teaching their own children their worldview - I might feel sorry for the kid who grows up knowing nothing of science and medicine, but it's their right (to a point - when it starts endangering their child's health and well-being). I DO however have problem when they start trying to teach it to my kids in the public schools. That's unconstitutional, and if it weren't, I'd be moving.
2006-11-01 14:36:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by eri 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
My 10-year-old son - who lives with me in Thailand - has been exposed to Buddhists, Christians, Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs.
I have never "taught" atheism, but I have answered honestly all questions about my own religious position. I usually say something like: "Some people believe xyz, but I tend to believe abc ..."
Ironically, my son went through a brief period of saying he was Buddhist, Hindu and then - for several months - Christian.
Right now he says he's not sure.
He's smart, and I'm not brainwashing him. So, my guess is there's about a 99% chance he will be an atheist, agnostic or freethinker as an adult.
2006-11-01 14:27:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Brendan G 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Actually I see teaching your personal brand of religion to kids as child abuse.
I decided that the only correct thing to do was explain the beliefs of all religions to our youngest son. He dismissed atheism right away and said that Buddhist teachings made the most sense to him.
He has always modeled the Buddhist ideas of tolerance and non violence in his dealings with others.
love and blessings Don
2006-11-01 14:26:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
First off, I don't yell at anyone, let alone religious parents teaching their religion to their kids. I may not agree with indoctrination, I may prefer to teach my own kids rather than indoctrinate, maybe even wish others would do the same, but I don't yell. And I don't force anyone to follow what I say and think.
Secondly, if a religious parent wants to indoctrinate their kids, knock yourselves out. They're your kids, not mine. I'll raise my kids the way I want and teach instead of indoctrinate, but if you want to induct them into a religion, go ahead. I might not agree, but it's not my place to say.
Thirdly, if I had kids, I wouldn't indoctrinate them into any religion. Atheism isn't a religion, rather the lack of one and lack of a belief in God or any gods at all, however, I wouldn't indoctrinate them into a life of non-belief, either. All I'd do is teach them about all religions, or at least as many as humanly possible. Teach, as in teach them what this or that religion believes, not teach as in tell them "this is the only true religion" and what have you.
Then, when my kids were old enough, I'd let them make their own choice as to what they believe. If its Christianity, fine. I'd know I've taught them about it well to let them make their own choice and I'd trust that I've also taught them to be respectful about their beliefs and others. I wouldn't be teaching them anything except respect and tolerance. The rest is up to them.
That's my take on it. If another person doesn't agree and would rather baptize their kids before they did anything more than sleep, eat, and poo, that's their business. Knock yourselves out because I don't have a hard time with that. I'd rather people taught their kids about different beliefs and tolerance, but I know not everybody does or even agrees with that and that's fine. I can deal with it.
I'd rather focus on my own kids when I have them and with their upbringing than waste my breath trying to tell others how to raise their kids, regardless of whether I agree or not. Your kids, your business. My kids, my business, end of story.
2006-11-02 15:01:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ophelia 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have allowed my 16 year old son to find his own path. Right now he is agnostic (his own description of himself). He occasionally attends churches of different faiths with various friends, and he has a good time but when he comes home he immediately says that he just doesn't get why these people are so gullible.
Who knows what he'll be when he grows up? And I will support him in whatever his decision is.
Peace
2006-11-01 14:26:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am an atheist, and I am not going to teach it to my children to be, when I have them. The problem isn't with religion, it's with pushing ideas on children when their minds are so open to them. Ideally, they should be exposed to a whole bunch of religions so that in the future they have the chance to pick one, instead of being forced to choose what their parents are. I am not the same religion my parents are, and they never pushed theirs on me.
2006-11-01 14:23:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
I know many atheists, and I have never met one who cares that other parents teach religion to their kids.
2006-11-01 14:21:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by snocy 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
at the start, A clarification, ok? i do no longer think of that all and sundry those that decision themselves ATHEISTS ARE pertaining to the comparable concept. one ought to declare that an atheist believes in no longer something extra effective than themselves, different than others of mankind. particular? DO you compromise with THIS "speculation"? background is ridden with people(S) (and their writings, and their histories) who've became their returned(s) on the church homes of previous (and a few cutting-side ones too) as they develop into disillusioned with the "DOCTRINES" that look in basic terms too unreal for them and their actuality. might you compromise? in case you do, please study on. could we assume, then, that it is not a assure that all and sundry church homes and religions are doing the artwork of "GOD"? OR, a "God" which you will possibly locate acceptable? might you concepts pondering this: Is it the church you (or your mom and dad, et. al.) have been given offended at, using fact they could have felt that the church suppressed them, their needs, their needs, their actuality? OR, did they actually get offended with GOD, who then could have favourite so ok.? have you ever considered that each and each NEW faith (q.v.) got here approximately by capacity of the dissatisfaction of individuals, who desperate to interrupt with the previous, and make some thing new? (Please evaluate that there are no longer any truths with out exceptions. I even have used a level of poetic license right here.) do you know what share faiths there interior the international? do you know what share distinctive "Christian" religions there are? one ought to question, "the place did the affection come from that provides you with the capacity to evaluate that your new child needs could be distinctive than your individual, spiritually?" could we evaluate that it is in basic terms a remember of probability. have you ever considered that the call for the "gods" in very almost all religions, while translated, propose "sturdy". My factor being, that one might decide to tell apart sturdy from EVIL, might you compromise? SOOOO, in case you have faith in issues sturdy and LOVING, possibly you're no longer probable an Atheist . . . i've got faith your new child will do nicely, with a discern such as you that has the braveness to invite the questions you do! Sleep on it, ok? PLEASE SEE THE REFERENCE, that I listed below for many-n-various information!
2016-10-21 03:07:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
if "not teaching" the kids with crapy religion = teaching atheism, then i guess it cant be avoided.
better teach "no god" than traumatize a young mind
2006-11-01 14:28:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by lnfrared Loaf 6
·
1⤊
0⤋