Shouldn't George W. Bush be gracious enough to apologize to the nation for his terrible debacle that has cost 2300 lives of US soldiers, not to mention dead journalists and civilians?
Does George Bush admit to anything?
2006-11-01 13:15:14 · 18 answers · asked by Reba K 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
He most surely should but the fact and sad fact at that is that most of the people here do not see that he did lie because they had to have someone to blame for the towers and it could not be someone hard to deal with such as Iran that does have proven ties to terrorist and in fact funds them trains them ect. Besides much easier to deal with someone that tried to kill daddy and already was seen not to have to much of a military from the desert storm days it was easy to do and all you had to do was make up some intel.
2006-11-01 14:31:17 · answer #1 · answered by billc4u 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
a million) This warfare isn't unlawful. It became voted FOR even by technique of the Ding Dong Kerry... 2) you won't be able to sue George Bush in basic terms because he's the president and also you don't love him... 3) The fallen soldier did not fall for not something! You tarnish his call by technique of exclaiming that. shame ON YOU! 4) This administration lied as a lot as the different. It quite a lot is area of description. 5) it seems you needed to get wealthy on a lack of existence of a soldier who served the rustic he/she loved and fought for it voluntarily. 6) You abviously don't realize and comprehend the fee of freedom you've... No more effective comments.
2016-12-05 10:58:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He need not apologize.
Bush is the commander in chief and as such, his job is to maintain the security of this country as best he sees fit. Wether you agree with his decisions or not is not a part of the issue because we live in a representative democracy (a republic) not a direct democracy.
Soldiers are volunteers to the service. They are fully aware of what they are getting into and of the risks and rewards of their actions. They are big boys and girls who do not require any pompous know it all nanny-state Democrats holding their hands and condescending to them.
As wars go the current casualty count (more than 2300) over a 3+ year time span is not very high. More were lost on D-day alone. I submit that for warfare the troops are getting pretty good odds today.
2006-11-01 13:25:19 · answer #3 · answered by CHEVICK_1776 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Well it has never been proven that he lied. At best you could he might apologize for being mistaken.
I do feel bad for the soldiers and civilians. The journalists? Who misses a buzzard?
2006-11-01 13:47:02 · answer #4 · answered by Philip L 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
As a paralyzed Vietnam Vet I will never forget John Kerry's traitorous remarks made years ago calling myself and my Brothers-in Arms all manner of names from "Baby-Killers" to "cowards" upon our return and now, our brave brothers and sisters are "stupid"?
I want to state that, 'Mr. John Kerry is not only a man of questionable honor but he should apologize for making statements that not only insult every brave young man and woman Serving but give yet again, "Aid and Comfort to the enemy.
We will now do everything humanly possible to mobilize the Conservative Base not necessarily to Vote to support current policy and Incumbents but to vote "against the Democrats" and the Nancy Pelosi San Francisco Values that party holds to!
This was the best thing he could have done to energize our base!
Now, how will the Far Left Wing ACLU Adoring Liberal Dems explain away this one...watch for the standard "disclaimers" mostly used for Dr Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi "Foot-In-Mouth attacks...i.e.:
"He was mis-quoted" or maybe, "His statement was taken out of context" or maybe he meant it?
2006-11-01 13:27:54 · answer #5 · answered by baltic072 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't care if he lied to us or not. I for one believe he believed there were Weapons there. Maybe the weapons were removed before we could find them? Can you disprove this? You expect a man to say he's sorry without proof? Nice try. He wouldn't be a leader if he did such a thing. Why are you in favor of terrorism? Are you a sleeper? I think the FBI should read this post.
2006-11-01 13:28:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Shouldn't Billy Bob Clinton apologise for his years of indifference that lead to this war?
2006-11-01 13:31:13 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
He's too busy dissing a another man he hates as much as he hated sadam for makin his daddy look bad. he has no idea what combat is about because he is an armchair quarterback.
he needs to apologize to the whole world
2006-11-01 13:20:36 · answer #8 · answered by Enigma 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
His Excellency George.w.Bush ,Of Course he apologize to the u.s soldiers as well to the family
2006-11-01 13:20:48 · answer #9 · answered by ranjithathatha 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Nice Idea, He should but he won't. His arrogance is amazing. To my knowledge he has never admitted to anything that he has done. Good Question!
2006-11-01 13:19:15 · answer #10 · answered by zepfan12 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋