Kerry made a stupid comment, and he should apologize. HOWEVER no soldiers died for that comment being made. Shouldn't Bush apologize for the 3000 deaths of our soldiers, while joking that he can't find the WMD that led us into Iraq.
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/WhoShouldApologize.wmv
2006-11-01 07:49:08 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
why is Kerry more to blame for exposing truth than Bush for lying his *** off?
Bush has yet to apologize for:
* Election fraud.
* Insulting all America by misusing 9/11 for his own political schemes.
* Awarding no-bid contracts to his cronies.
* Sending out troops into harm's way without adequate planning or equipment.
* Lying every time he opens his mouth.
* Driving down America's prestige worldwide.
or any number of other things.
2006-11-01 07:57:58 · answer #1 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Kerry should apologize first. Demoralizing Americans is not proper behavior for a US Senator.
We have found plenty of WMD in Iraq. Please try to keep up. Yes, this is the sort of stuff Saddam used to wipe out entire villages and that the UN said he absolutely had to hand over or face 'serious consequences'. Saddam was caught red handed.
Kerry is trying to demoralize Americans and our troops. It's a repeat performance of his aid to the Communist Vietcong. They gave him credit for helping them win the war through the media when they could not win it on the battlefield.
The demoralization effort is a signal to the enemy to keep fighting while their allies in the US help bring them victory. That's why the Vietcong fought on long after they were militarily beaten, killing more and more people, holding onto the hope that Kerry and his ilk would defeat America from within. It worked. With the current war, which deposed Leftist leader Saddam Hussein, his Leftist allies are once again trying to bring defeat to America, urging the enemy to keep on fighting while they do as much damage on the home front as possible.
I personally videotaped Cindy Sheehan saying the goal is to demoralize young Americans, discourage them from joining the military, thereby eliminate the US military and give advantage to Socialists like Hugo Chavez.
2006-11-01 07:50:22 · answer #2 · answered by speakeasy 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
he received't apologies right this moment. once yet another president takes his position he might want to. If he apologizes now, he shows weak point: in himself, the rustic, and maximum significantly the troops. the want good moral the following contained in the united states of a so as that they'll stay positive over "there".
2016-12-05 10:42:29 · answer #3 · answered by levatt 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush
2006-11-01 07:56:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
YOU should apologize to this world for existing! Go to hell you dumbass! Your a freak and a weirdo and i bet you havent got any friends or any money at all. People like you make my blood boil.
2006-11-01 13:14:04 · answer #5 · answered by ilina 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually I think Kerry should. As should you now.
2006-11-01 07:50:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Stay the course! Kerry's a moron.
2006-11-01 07:51:59 · answer #7 · answered by kam_1261 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Kerry should.
2006-11-01 12:21:39 · answer #8 · answered by General P. 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
THE DEMOCRATS THAT VOTED TO SEND IN TROOPS WHILE BUSH WAS IN OFFICE. THE SAME DEMOCRATS THAT REFUSED TO DO IT WHEN CLINTON WAS IN OFFICE. THE DEMOCRATS ARE PLAYING POLITICS WITH THE LIVES OF OUR TROOPS.
2006-11-01 07:55:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush should apologize for killing all of them.
2006-11-01 07:51:33 · answer #10 · answered by lilmomma91206 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋