English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For example, if you took a bite out of a live bear, would it be better for you than say eating a grilled bear steak?

2006-11-01 07:45:16 · 5 answers · asked by The Governor of the Chapped Star 2 in Health Diet & Fitness

The answers so far have been terrible. Look, I'm a big dude and I can easily handle a bear by myself and take a bite out of him at my whim. I'm talking strickly about the health benifits or lack thereof from eating raw foods like raw bear meat.

2006-11-01 08:17:09 · update #1

I meant to say strictly not stirckly.

2006-11-01 08:18:04 · update #2

5 answers

You are kidding, right. You try taking a bite out of a live bear and see what happens to you. You will be remembered as that stupid guy who tried to bite a bear!! LOL

I don't care how big you are, the bear will be bigger and meaner, especially if you bit him.

2006-11-01 08:03:24 · answer #1 · answered by Caleb's Mom 6 · 0 0

I figure you've got that wrong! If you get that close to a live bear, HE will be most likely to take a bite out of YOU! And figure it is better than grilled man-steak. Lots 'o luck, dude.

2006-11-01 15:56:24 · answer #2 · answered by hillbilly 7 · 0 0

No there is no difference in it health wise. But raw meat does have more calories than cooked meat. I wouldnt recommend eating raw mammals though with disease and all. Fish is the only meat that should be eatin raw and thats only if it is prepared right.

2006-11-01 17:01:28 · answer #3 · answered by zack 3 · 1 0

If you bite a live bear you will end up being his next meal. No that would not be better for you

2006-11-01 15:47:24 · answer #4 · answered by Abby 6 · 0 0

it is always better to eat something cooked than raw....duh

2006-11-01 15:54:18 · answer #5 · answered by brandiejs1979 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers