Evolutionists: Are you being cheated by Scientists?

Question

Check this website:www.mcremo.com/hidden

Here is an excerpt of its contents:

"This is a position that is close to my own heart; indeed it forms the basis of my book Fingerprints of the Gods. There, however, my focus was exclusively on the last 20,000 years and on the possibility that an advanced global civilization may have flourished more than 12,000 years ago only to be wiped out and forgotten in the great cataclysm that brought the last Ice Age to an end.
In The Hidden History of the Human Race Cremo and Thompson go much further, pushing back the horizons of our amnesia not just 12,000 or 20,000 years, but millions of years into the past, and showing that almost everything we have been taught to believe about the origins and evolution of our species rests on the shaky foundation of academic opinion, and on a highly selective sampling of research results..."

QUESTION: WHY HIGHLY SELECTIVE SAMPLING??

Here is another remark about this UNPOPULAR RESEARCH:l

"Over the past two centuries researchers have found bones and artifacts showing that people like ourselves existed on earth millions of years ago. But the scientific establishment has ignored these remarkable facts because they contradict the dominant views of human origins and antiquity. Cremo and Thompson challenge us to rethink our understanding of human origins, identity, and destiny. Forbidden Archeology takes on one of the most fundamental components of the modern scientific world view, and invites us to take a courageous first step towards a new perspective."

Andymc, etc: This research do not contradict the Bible. In the Bible the term "day" or "days" could refer to indifinite length of time. Thus you can find expressions:

'A thousand years to man is like ( note: not equal) one day to you.'

Hi everyone.

Here are additional comments:

Thompson and Cremo laid out an overwhelming array of evidence for extremely ancient man: a five-million-year-old skull from Italy; bones found in a 286-million-year-old coal bed in Pennsylvania; an ornate vase from 500-million-year-old deposits; and 10-million-year-old flint tools from Burma - to name just a few. Few critics take issue with the actual evidence Thompson and Cremo presented. Instead, some resorted to "infantile name-calling," as Cremo put it in a recent interview, "refusing to confront evidence in a serious way - that was the response from what I would call the fundamentalist, Darwinist element."

Want Proof of "Scientific Censorship"?
Here is one.

NBC's Mysterious Origins of Man
JUNE 1996 NBC PRESS RELEASE: CONTROVERSY SURROUNDS THE MYSTERIOUS ORIGINS OF MAN UNIVERSITY PROFS WANT SPECIAL BANNED FROM THE AIRWAVES
Program that Dares to Challenge Accepted Beliefs About Pre-Historic Man to be Rebroadcast June 8 on NBC

Answer 1

give some data about your statement not opinions.
By the way, what kind of publisher is BBT science?
I tried to look it up, but they don't even seem to have a website.
Which leads me to suspect that the publisher is identical with the author.
Anybody who can not get a reputable publisher to publish their books but has to self publish will be under the strong suspicion to avoid any editing and outside critic - or that their ideas can't take it.
Nothing you quoted made me remotely interested in reading those books. If you get a percentage, you have to do a much better job in advertising. Don't quit your other job yet.

Answer 2

Millions of years? So you concede that Genesis can't be literally true? If their findings are valid creationism must be wrong as well as evolution or was that obvious fact lost on you? In any case theories require study-hypotheses have to be tested. The theory of evolution is backed up by decades of study by thousands of scientists-what is this particular theory backed up with-the wishful thinking of two individuals?

Answer 3

No, I am not being cheated by the millions of scientists. You are willingly being cheated by two naive and dishonest writers.

Answer 4

Get it peer reviewed in Nature and come back to me.

PS no such thing as 'Evolutionists'.

Answer 5

The Bible Says the Earth is Young
by Kyle Butt, M.A.
[Español]
Printer version | Email this article

To the sincere and honest student, what the Bible says about the age of the Earth deserves serious consideration. For those who believe that there is a God, that Jesus is His Son, and that the Bible is His Word, this section offers an accurate answer to the question about the Earth’s age.

It certainly would have solved many problems if God had put a verse in the Bible that said something to the effect of: “When Jesus was born, the Earth was exactly 4,134 years old.” Obviously, no such statement can be found in The Book, but that does not mean that the answer is not there. Many times, in order to find out what the Bible says about a particular subject, we must look at several different verses and piece them together like a puzzle. So, let’s take one piece at a time.

In one sense, the Bible tells us exactly how old the Earth is. In Mark 10:6, Jesus stated: “From the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female.” How long has humankind been on this Earth? Jesus said “from the beginning of the creation.” Genesis 1:26-31 explains that God chose the sixth day of the Creation week to form mankind from the dust of the ground. Were humans a part of that six-day beginning? Indeed they were. But what does it matter if mankind was formed on day six? Exodus 20:11 records: “For in six days Jehovah made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day….” Quite simply, that piece of information, combined with the information from Genesis 1 and Mark 10:6, informs us the Earth is exactly five days older than humanity!

In order to determine the age of the Earth, then, we must determine how long man has been here—which is not as difficult as it may seem. Speaking in round figures, it has been about 2,000 years since Jesus Christ visited the Earth. Secular history volunteers that piece of information, since it is A.D. 2002 (A.D. standing for anno Domini, meaning “in the year of the Lord”). Next, we must determine how many years came between Jesus Christ and Abraham. Secular history also volunteers this figure, which turns out to be about 2,000. These two figures can be obtained from practically any secular history book.

The final number we must uncover is the number of years between Abraham and Adam. We know from Genesis 1:1-5 that the Earth was created on day one. We know from Paul’s statement in 1 Corinthians 15:45 that Adam was “the first man.” And we know from Genesis 1 that Adam was created on day six of the Creation week. If we could determine the number of years between Adam and Abraham, that would place us within five days of “the beginning.” All that would be necessary to calculate an approximate age for the Earth would be to add the three figures together—the time from Adam to Abraham, the time from Abraham to Jesus, and the time from Jesus to us. The figure representing the time between Abraham and Adam cannot be retrieved from secular history, of course (nor should we expect it to be), since the Noahic Flood would have destroyed most, if not all, of the records pertaining to that time period. How, then, can we determine the number of years in that time span?

In chapter 3 of the book that bears his name, Luke lists 55 generations between Jesus and Abraham—a time that archaeology has determined to be about 2,000 years (see Kitchen and Douglas, 1982). In that same chapter, Luke documents that there were only 20 generations between Abraham and Adam. How much time is covered by those twenty generations? Since Genesis 5 provides the ages of the fathers at the time of the births of the sons in the period between Abraham and Adam, it is a simple matter to calculate the approximate number of years during that time span—a figure that turns out to be about 2,000. In chart form it looks like this:
Present to Jesus 2,000 years
Jesus to Abraham 2,000 years (55 generations)
Abraham to Adam 2,000 years (20 generations)

[The fact that the 55 generations between Jesus and Abraham cover 2,000 years, while only 20 generations between Abraham and Adam cover the same amount of time, is explained quite easily on the basis of the vast ages of the patriarchs (e.g., Methuselah, who lived 969 years—Genesis 5:27).]

Some have argued that the genealogies in Genesis 5 cannot be used to show the age of the Earth because they contain huge gaps. But in Jude verse 14, the writer noted that “Enoch was the seventh from Adam” (he is listed, in fact, exactly seventh in the genealogies in Genesis 5:21). Therefore, we know that there are no gaps between the first seven patriarchs, because Jude, writing by inspiration of the Holy Spirit, confirmed the Old Testament account. That leaves only 13 generations with possible gaps between them. In order to accommodate the evolutionary scenario that man has been on the Earth (in some form) approximately 3.5 million years, one would need to insert approximately 290,000 years between each of the 13 generations. It does not take a wealth of Bible knowledge or common sense to see that this quickly becomes ludicrous. Who could believe that the first seven of these generations are so exact, while the remaining 13 contain “gaps” of over 290,000 years each? What kind of biblical exegesis would that represent?

The Bible plainly teaches, after all the pieces have been put together, that the Earth is only about 6,000 or so years old. It is a young Earth after all!

REFERENCES

Kitchen, Kenneth A. and J.D. Douglas, eds. (1982), The New Bible Dictionary (Wheaton, IL: Tyndale), second edition.

Answer 6

Not possible Creation happened