It would be like water world! everyone would live on boats, and the oil tankers could sore up on food b4 the 200 feet of water rise. And we would have kevin costner here and everything! why don't we endorse the oil companys to give us low fueled suvs and just let global warming happen?
2006-11-01 05:13:54 · 8 answers · asked by triumph the insult comic dog 1 in Environment
Yeah! Then we can drink our own pee, just like in "Water World." Sounds exciting!
2006-11-01 05:35:44 · answer #1 · answered by ecogrl23 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The number one thing I must inform you about is global warming is already here it happens every day. And many people have given the oil companies way to lower the coast of fuel but they stuff those Idea's in to a draw and they pay off the people who come up with those Ideas, so the oil companies can keep us depended on there fuel.
2006-11-01 05:21:07 · answer #2 · answered by wolf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One small problem with that. I thought people could learn to live on sea weed and fish. Only if the city's were under water it would be so polluted that the fish would die and so would the sea weed.
Better get some pots and potting soil before it happens.
Oh, wait global warming will cause tornado's and hurricanes.
That is bad in a boat.
2006-11-01 05:17:51 · answer #3 · answered by butch 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Aside from the fact that the environment is already suffering from pollution, the warming doesn't just go up to a nice comfortable 78 degrees and then hold there for us to enjoy. The real threat of global warming is that it continues (runnaway environmental disaster) until the planet becomes so hot that nothing can survive. Nice picture of the future for your great grandchildren?
2006-11-01 05:22:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would not be like that at all. Even if all the ice in the world melted, sea levels would only rise a hundred meters or so. There would be flooding of low areas, like Florida and Holland, but most of the land area of the world would still be high and dry.
2006-11-01 05:35:13 · answer #5 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. All the people who live on the coastlines would loose there homes. That would crush the already strained economy and you do realize that a short time after the glaciers melt comes another ice age, don't you. No, we shouldn't be smiling. We should be uniting as a world to try to fix the problem while there's still time.
2006-11-01 05:17:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in basic terms watched the day after the following day-- with out anymore bases to circulate off of then that action picture i might say you guess international warming is for genuine I observed an previous twilight zone (b/w) the place the sunlight replaced into getting closer and all and sundry replaced into approximately to fry up - then- guy wakes up and the reality is the sunlight is shifting farther away and all and sundry is freezing-- I guess some politicians observed this episoide and pushed technology into coming up with a gaggle of iffy documents that the easy individual could no longer verify (specific the ice caps are breaking away yet how do you recognize what replaced into taking place with them 1000 years in the past -- you do no longer) concept #a million: reward of G.W. scare meant to up sales for vehicle and equipment manufactures proceeding to fulfill standards and staggering potential celeb rankings is this a difficulty in itself? procuring extra gas useful autos and potential celeb home equipment vs protecting directly to those that worked -- Junk yards/ land fills/ fields of green: crammed with previous autos and not potential celeb home equipment-- boy i circulate down yet this is the element--- there is little probability your staying dry if the deliver is sinking or ought to i say spinning out of control
2016-11-26 22:04:55 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Global warming is a myth made up by Al Gore so he can get as much college tail as Clinton did. There is no proof.
2006-11-01 05:23:44 · answer #8 · answered by CallMeDigitalBob 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋