sun, wind, atom,water,waves....
It is possible that the world is heading towards a global energy crisis due to a decline in the availability of cheap oil and recommendations to a decreasing dependency on fossil fuel. This has led to increasing interest in alternate power/fuel research such as fuel cell technology, hydrogen fuel, biomethanol, biodiesel, Karrick process, solar energy, tidal energy and wind energy , and fusion energy. To date, only hydroelectricity and nuclear power have been significant alternatives to fossil fuel (see Future energy development), with big ecological problems (residues and water spending). Hydrogen gas is currently produced at a net energy loss from natural gas, which is also experiencing declining production in North America and elsewhere. When not produced from natural gas, hydrogen still needs another source of energy to create it, also at a loss during the process. This has led to hydrogen being regarded as a 'carrier' of energy rather than a 'source'.
There have been alarming predictions by groups such as the Club of Rome that the world would run out of oil in the late 20th century. Although technology has made oil extraction more efficient, the world is having to struggle to provide oil by using increasingly costly and less productive methods such as deep sea drilling, and developing environmentally sensitive areas such as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The world's population continues to grow at a quarter of a million people per day, increasing the consumption of energy. The per capita energy consumption of China, India and other developing nations continues to increase as the people living in these countries adopt more energy intensive lifestyles. At present a small part of the world's population consumes a large part of its resources, with the United States and its population of 300 million people consuming far more oil than China with its population of 1.3 billion people.
Efficiency mechanisms such as Negawatt power can provide significantly increased supply. It is a term used to describe the trading of increased efficiency, using consumption efficiency to increase available market supply rather than by increasing plant generation capacity.
http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/
2006-11-01 03:21:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Fortunately, Toyota didn't following the stupidity of GM's Calif. test car; the electric car...experiment with 3000 cars, which they pulled a couple of years back and destroyed. Toyota is now using the same type batteries in their new 100 mpg hybrids..
http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center-article_42/
And then there are the Negres, a family, father and son team, who have developed the air car. A car run on Compressed air stored in tanks. $2.00 will buy enough air to get 100 miles down the road at 55 mph. a great ride for the daily commuters.....wonder what the maintence is on this one?? Can't be too difficult. The world is a changing. Solar strips for the home roofs: conventional or metal, mfg'd. by the same mind (old gentleman) that gave GM the car batteries for their electrical test cars, has created an electrical generation marvel to save on the cost of running a household or a business.
And wind power, where weather patterns make this a feasible alternative to solar panels, will generally generate several times the electrical power solar panels will generate, for the same amount of investment. Windmills run 24/7, generating and storing electrical power, where a solar panel is only 100% for 4 or 5 hrs. out of 24.
2006-11-01 03:46:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by jeeveswantstoknow 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
hi Tania, did no longer I definitely answer an identical question to this one? merely precise, looking out by potential of potential of the innovations you're transforming into to be already to this question, i think the respond is sparkling. the proper replace energy to commerce fossil fuels is all of them. a different energy financial equipment must be the out of the consumer-friendly for our destiny. in the beginning, regardless of what energy we use, fossil, wind, daylight hours, hydro, biomass, and so on, quicker or later something will come alongside and make one among them the two unavailable, inconvenient, prohibitively high priced, immoral or fattening. Which ever one that's, it probable severe-superb if it least complicated made up 10 or 20 share of our blend, somewhat than ninety%. this way it would be basic paintings to retool and offset that energy source with the 5 - 6 different ones we are already utilising. based heavily on fossil fuels is what has gotten us into this pickle interior the 1st venture. So now we comprehend ourselves having to do be taught and developement on a quantity of marvelous energy components at one time. The opposite reason to diversify our components is geography. A merely appropriate alternative potential source in Nantucket probable a foul one in Tucumcari, and so on. The Dakotas have the adequate wind sensible source in our u . s ., the image voltaic is fit interior the west, the Northwest has merely precise hydro components, and so on. indexed under are some components to accomplish a little be taught on your very own on your paper. high quality good fortune, and take care, Rudydoo
2016-12-28 09:30:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We do need to work on nuclear, both fission and fusion. Fusion is clean. Many new wind mills are being installed. There is hydro power in certain areas. We are working on coal gasification, coal liquification. We have lots of coal. (In Germany during WW II they worked on the same process) There is tar sands, oil shale, garbage burning, biomass, etanol and biogas production, wave and tidal power, solar, (very useful in desert areas) geothermal in certain areas. We still need work on hydrogen fuel, but it is coming.
2006-11-01 03:36:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by science teacher 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bio fuel. Nuclear power. Solar. Hydroelectric. Wind. All of which we are using now. Maybe fusion power, which is just another type of nuclear
2006-11-01 04:04:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the hot air from blowhard politicians
2006-11-01 03:25:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by seanachie60 4
·
0⤊
0⤋