But even if the Bible has an error (which it doesn't), that still doesn't produce transitional fossils, or identify beneficial mutations, or account for the exquisite design in living things. Such diversionary tactics are really a futile attempt to avoid the personal implications of creation.
2006-11-01 01:06:31 · 4 answers · asked by proscunio 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Whenever I find something that seems a contradiction, I study it further. I am the one that is wrong.
2006-11-01 01:11:32 · answer #1 · answered by RB 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
We have science that discovers transitional fossils, and beneficial mutations but still refutes the bibles claim of 6000 yr old humanity, talking animals and a global flood.
2006-11-01 09:36:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I ask you if this is an error. God is good.
Can we first define good. I have tried defining good and then applying it to God and your "God" does not meet the standard. i have tried the reverse, Good is God. This leaves me with the problem that in order to be good I would have to use violence to solve issues as opposed to finding more peaceful solutions. Somehow, something is wrong.
2006-11-01 09:28:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, the denial of truth.
2006-11-01 09:16:24 · answer #4 · answered by Gods child 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋