like fallujah, most citizens were evacuted, how come we didnt just bomb them (non nuclear)? we would have saved soldiers, time, money, morale...even if "women and children" perished, they could have left (they werent being held hostage) since the area was terrorrist heaven. to be honest, arent women and children LEAST important to the family unit? think about this -
if the male dies (eg our soldiers that did) then
a) the family unit is completely devastated if the woman doesnt have a job
b)she will prob need to remarry , with children this is hard
c)the children do not have the proper leadership
if mother goes
a)father remarries, family unit eventually resolved
if child goes
a)another is made
so, even though any death is sad, we cant sacrifice our forces for some obstinate civilians shielding radicals, can we?
2006-10-31 19:15:39 · 12 answers · asked by billy 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I totally agree about the bombing part. I mean what have we got an Airforce for anyway. It worked during WWII, it would work now. We are way to worried about looking PC.
To quote Gen Patton, " May God have mercy on their souls, because I sure won't!"
2006-10-31 19:29:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I was in Falluja. Trust me, there were very FEW civilians left in the city.
The amount of damage a nuke would have cause on the innocent people's home that we would eventually have to pay to fix, it was easier just to clear them out ourselves.
2006-10-31 19:43:18 · answer #2 · answered by SGT 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It amazes me how people can justify death and destruction of innocent women and children in any way that fits their ignorant ideology. You're a reptile.
2006-10-31 20:31:37 · answer #3 · answered by PS Drummer 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the rustic used them against the eastern human beings. some say that it became for the income of the "greater". Nooot probably. whilst human beings die and go through interior this horror you recognize that something isn't precise.
2016-10-03 04:00:12 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because it would turn many Iraq's against America under these circumstances America would have lost the war.
2006-10-31 20:52:04 · answer #5 · answered by supremecritic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My goodness; we couldn't just go in there and "bomb" them like that---we'll get in trouble!! We HAVE to remember the rules of enagement. And, believe me, they know that. They use that against us; because we value life and they don't.
2006-10-31 19:21:16 · answer #6 · answered by Nancy D 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i guess you r drunk
or
u r a half brained creature
or
u have thinking disorder
or
u r kid of age 4.
2006-10-31 19:39:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm pretty sure that most of them had no other option but to stay.
2006-10-31 19:21:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
only the people who do these things can answer this one im afraid
2006-10-31 19:58:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're a racist.
2014-10-24 11:35:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋