I take your guru, and I hide him in my basket. He says, "hello dear sir, you may plunder my land but you will never plunder my soul." Can he really be taken?
S'alright?
S'alright
I take your guru, and he hides me in his basket.
I take your guru, and he sells me to the british.
I take your guru, and I make a basket of nuclear weapons.
I take your guru, and we plunder India with chocolate for milk.
Do not feel like a victim. There is suffering and plundering throughout all lands, as there is suffering and plundering throughout all minds.
Can it be said that "India is hot?"
2006-10-31 19:02:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
India may not be the most plundered country , but it could be the ASIA as the Invaders came to these places.
2006-11-01 03:03:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by s a 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not sure that India is the most plundered country by invaders. However, I am sure India is the most plundered country by insiders!
2006-11-05 00:07:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Plunder in the sense that they took away material wealth is that what you mean? From material point the Spaniards looted more gold in south America than all the plunderers did in India
2006-11-01 07:06:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Brahmanda 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
India was plundered no doubt. But its culture and civilization were not destroyed fully even though efforts were made. In other asian countries like, Indonesia, Philipines etc the countries were plundered and their civilization was destroyed. In countries in the South American, North American and African continents the plunder was complete. Their wealth was looted, they were subjugated, their civilizations and cultures were destroyed completely and they lost their identity. Even today native Africans say, the Europeans came, gave them the Bible and as they were reading it, they looted every thing from the natives.Wherever the Europeans went as conquerers, they destroyed the local civilizations and cultures and indulged in forcible religious conversions except in the case of China and India.
2006-11-01 03:27:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'd say it's pretty hard to measure that. Some cultures were completely destroyed forever by invaders and India wasn't so who knows.
2006-11-01 03:11:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by casey54 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, it sounds right. they had a matriarchal society that did not pride itself on war and battle but had a lot of wealth so were easy picking for anyone with a spear.
Africa had a lot of warriors but technology was not their strong suit so also got plundered a lot after the invention of the machine gun by the british. before that they were hard to beat.
2006-11-01 03:01:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, the whole of North and South America beats it hands down.
2006-11-01 03:00:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, as it is said "gur hai to makkhiyan to aayege hi"
means if there is sweet there will be flies.
Richness of india attracted a lot invaders.
2006-11-03 09:09:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by vinisha v 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What about south America?
2006-11-01 02:59:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋