I need a bigger vehicle, so I'm looking at vans. I've made my mind up on that aspect (really need that third row and storage space), but I'm wondering which is better, a Dodge Caravan or a Pontiac Montana, both 2006.
By better I mean, worthiness, ammenities, looks, things like this.
Anyone with any experience with these particular models have any advice, pros, cons, things to consider?
I've driven Dodge cars for over 11 yrs due to the fact that I've found them the best for comfort and ammenties for my price range, but we're kind of liking that the Montana looks more SUV-ish.
Anyway, Thanks!
2006-10-31 16:25:09 · 6 answers · asked by Terri 6 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Buying & Selling
Both are decent vehicles. However there are some areas in which the Chrysler product, in this case the Dodge Caravan may be the better choice. First off, the Caravan far and away is the more popular of the two. The advantage is there are more Caravans to choose from, new or used. Also there have been more on the road, longer, since 1984 in fact. It is easier to check the reliability factor, as well as being able to get parts down the road if you need it. The Dodge, and the Chrysler Town and Country, and the earlier Plymouth Voyager sold more mini vans then every other brand combined. The new Dodge has a higher crash test safety rating as well. There are more engine options on the Dodge as well , and they make more HP if you need to tow. Ultimately the choice is yours , but I would lean more to the Dodge. Good hunting.
2006-10-31 17:03:53 · answer #1 · answered by stevensings20032001 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I just took a look at both of them, and was comparing them, but it's kind of hard not knowing which features that you want. Both are very good cars, but in my own personal opinion, I think the Dodge Caravan is the better of the two choices. You will just have to test drive them, and only you can make that choice. Good Luck, on your new vehicle..
2006-10-31 16:49:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
LMAO evidently, with the aid of fact i admire instruments, I performed around with it some greater, have been given some issues discovered, have been given countless purposes loaded and dealing, between those are midpSSH, jMirc, Google communicate, Google Maps, Blackberry Messenger, Mobipocket Reader, and a few others. great. exciting toy, if it weren't for my attainable deniability argument long previous down the crapper. So finally, I emerged from my basement and positioned the (now) Dingleberry on the shelf with our telephones to cost. what's that? No sign? Hah! I win! No sign on the 1st floor, in basic terms interior the basement, and gooing down the stairs to tutor the Blackberry right into a Dingleberry takes me approximately 6.4 seconds, so I win! So, the Blackberry can stay, the soreness interior the *** isn't as great because it could have been. An please, T-cellular, do on no account build a tower out right here.
2016-10-03 03:55:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dodge caravan, hands down a better van. While GM has improved their products, they are not known for their vans; thats where Chrysler shines. Afterall, Chrysler invented the mini-van. Now, if we were comparing SUVS, or sports cars, itd' be a different story.
2006-10-31 18:18:36 · answer #4 · answered by KEiKo 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My father in law has had a Caravan and it has been reliable and good, so new ones probably are even better. But you can try the Montana if you like it.
2006-10-31 17:27:28 · answer #5 · answered by wazup1971 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
pontiac for sure you should know why
2006-10-31 18:41:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋