2006-10-31 15:45:58 · 16 answers · asked by UFOMAN4 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Tricky question because his administration basically found ways around specific laws; although, many times he has blatantly ignored the constitution that he took an oath to uphold and honor.
The number one issue is that many times he created legislation using executive orders then within that legislation, made the executive branch (his department) the ones assigned to enforce it. This allows him to basically do whatever he wants with no accountability whatsoever.
As far as going to jail for any of this, I'm not sure if any of it would hold up in court BUT he definitely could be convicted of war crimes via the Geneva Convention and rules created by the ICC, International Criminal Court.
2006-10-31 15:53:47 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hmmm.... How about misleading congress in to a needless war (not really illegal, but he's a d!ck for it), Actually STATING that he is above the law, passing laws that violate our constitution and Inalienable rights as human beings and citizens of the united states, and having business dealings with an entity that we are at war with (the League of Arab Nations fiasco). THERE.
2006-10-31 18:55:12 · answer #2 · answered by pinkofaggot16 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it appears that evidently that some will in no way admit to nor evaluate the certainty that Bush has devoted any variety of conflict crimes. by using fact the Bush administration chosen to no longer align themselves with the guidelines/regulations governing the habit of so-pronounced as international leaders - quite in a time of conflict (and an pointless and unlawful one at that) - would not excuse this guy. Bush isn't as dumb as he each and every so often seems to be. He knew lots greater suitable than maximum - attributable to the mendacity enter of the neocons, Rove, and different warmongers- with regard to the plans to dupe the prevalent public into believing we had a valid reason to invade and occupy Iraq. We undergo in recommendations his early representations--that he employed people who have been the 'experts' of their fields. Then we've been given into this mess. His pass worked. He employed the "experts." nicely gee men, If something is going incorrect, blame them. besides maximum have been silly adequate to have faith those liars. yet no longer all. Myself blanketed. Bush believed them additionally, yet he believed them by using fact it grew to become into all a factor of the conflict activity.
2016-12-28 09:13:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do the supreme court justices belong in jail for making the laws and circumventing the government all together and the will of the people?
2006-10-31 15:54:01 · answer #4 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
George Bush needs to be housed in a facility for the mentally challenged. I dare say, a few of them might have something up on him.
2006-10-31 15:52:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why? Isn't he a politician? They are a class unto themselves. I'm sure there's a handbook somehwere telling them exactly what laws they can ignore, after all WE paid them to make them. Why not break them?
2006-10-31 15:52:53 · answer #6 · answered by Con H 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, why does he keep getting away with stuff? Just because he's the President doesn't mean he should get away with breaking the law.
2006-10-31 15:54:29 · answer #7 · answered by J 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Lets wait a few months and find out.
2006-10-31 15:47:57 · answer #8 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No But john kerry should be in jail and hie mouth tape shut.
2006-10-31 15:56:14 · answer #9 · answered by canivieu 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Of course.
2006-10-31 16:02:15 · answer #10 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋