LOL!!! It's not Moses sweetie. His name was Noah.
2006-10-31 21:56:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am amazed at the lack of knowledge people exhibit sometimes, and no, I'm not referring to your question about "Moses" rather than Noah. There is very solid evidence that the land mass of the world was configured very differently before the flood and that most land was connected. The pre-flood world has been referred to as Pangaea. The flood had a traumatic and cataclysmic impact on the earth, and I believe it triggered what scientists call the Continental Drift. The earth's plates are still moving, but the power of the flood disrupted the structure of land mass. What's more, I don't think there was such a thing as the Arctic and Antarctic before the flood. The earth was surrounded by a mist and the temperature and plants were very different. To answer your questions, animals didn't have to cross continents and oceans when they assembled to the ark, and the climate back then was not as extreme as it is now. I do not believe in evolution, but I do believe that animals have adapted WITHIN their species, to accommodate climate. Parrots do that when released in the U.S. and although they are tropical birds, they can adapt to snow and cold and survive in those environments for years.
2006-10-31 16:48:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by whiteparrot 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Moses had a deal worked out with Noah. Some how the paper work got washed away in the storm( were still investigating that one) any how until we get that straight the polar bears and penguins will get to stay in the country on a work visa.
2006-10-31 14:34:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by stonedpigeon1 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
First it was Noah. Second i wasn't alive back then and the bible doesn't get real to specific. Also if god flooded the earth then wouldn't all sea animals survive anyway. Did the two animals have sex all the time. One was female and the other was male. Makes you think doesn't it.
2006-10-31 14:28:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Donovan G 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it was Noah. By the way, the catastrophe was 4 'disobedient' human beings. So probably it flooded only human habitats which were centred around the middle-east. Noah had 2 preserve animals living only on those parts of the world.
2006-10-31 14:31:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Banglacat 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Noah, two of every kind, to go into the ark
God brought them there, and there is something about animals that
they know when danger is near
2006-10-31 14:29:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gifted 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably not. The world, as conceptualized by the ancient people writing the Noah story, was flat, covered by a dome, and there was no concept of a north or south pole--or polar bears.
2006-10-31 14:27:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by carwheelsongravel1975 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dude? Moses? The animals came to him (Noah) anyway.
2006-10-31 14:27:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by moviesmiss1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
God created the cold animals after the flood.
2006-10-31 14:30:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by cheri b 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
did it say he had penguins? Because if not then its possible that god had an eskimo collect two of every ice animal. Not to mention they live on ice. Which floats on water. And therefore were likely not threatened by a great flood. This all is said assuminig you believe there was a flood and such on and such forth.
2006-10-31 14:28:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by spirenteh 3
·
1⤊
0⤋