English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

In most states, insurance is not dependent on the car being registered, but this is not true in all states. For example, Mass has it set up that your insurance is not in effect until the car is registered at the RMV (their name for DMV or MVA) office.

If you said which state you were asking about, I might have been able to give a more complete answer!

2006-10-31 13:09:54 · answer #1 · answered by fire4511 7 · 1 0

In most cases, you do need proof on ownership. A title, bill of sale, or registration will do. a lady I just talked to, had a toyota, that she took off the road two years ago. she was still paying insurance on it. and hasn't had a registration in that long. So I would have to say no, especially if you already had insurance on it. That would be your proof, that you have owned that vehicle.

2006-10-31 19:59:25 · answer #2 · answered by Speedbuggy43 4 · 0 0

Sure. Why not? They have an obligation to the OWNER of the car and it is reasonable to demand proof of ownership.

2006-10-31 20:01:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes yes yes

2006-10-31 21:19:23 · answer #4 · answered by spencer 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers