So muss fuss is made about other countries aquiring atomic weapons, yet we allowed India and Pakistan to have them. India has tripled theirs from 20 to 60 and Pakistan feels left behing with only 30 (from 20) and I don't trust them ( the government, that is ) - no beef with the people - They fought countless wars over Kashmir so I assume that the next one will be an atomic one, no question there................ Any answers ?????
2006-10-31 10:55:46 · 23 answers · asked by Rachmonskikaya1289 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The same reason why the US has it. So u trust your US govt handling nukes? Because they are the only irresponsible govt on earth to have used it, killing millions, and causing suffering and deformities (for the next few generations) to another few million people for life.
So why does US have nuclear weapons?? I don't trust the US govt with nukes. And since the US govt likes to go to war so often, should the rest of the world assume that the next war US will have will be a nuclear one?
People in glass houses don't throw stones at others.
2006-10-31 16:46:22 · answer #1 · answered by khali 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The cold war and the arms build up was based on the promise that no one would start a nuclear war if they new the pay off was mutual annihilation. India and Pakistan have their problems, but neither one has publicly admitted that they would gladly see 1/3 of their population die if they could wipe the other off the face of the earth. If you fear your enemy will drop a nuclear bomb on you, your only option is to be able to retaliate in kind (mutual destruction threat). I feel that if you have good allys with nukes, then you should sign a treaty that would commit them to nuking the country that nuked you. That way you can at least claim a higher moral ground and still have the mutual annihilation working in your favor. Only when a country believes that mutual annihilation is not that bad of an option, then all the other countries that are odds at them in any way will not be comfortable with them having nukes.
2016-05-22 21:22:32 · answer #2 · answered by Dawn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you wish to discover ways to stop any type of abuse the you should have this program of Bruce Perry, Patriot Self Defense , a course that you merely will find it here https://tr.im/VuLyz
Patriot Self Defense can teach you a highly successful self-defense system that is been field-tested in houses, at government events and on some of the meanest roads in the world against probably the most questionable, clever and dangerous criminal.
With Patriot Self Defense you may find out that's easier then you definitely expected to protect your self since you do not need to be an expert or have strength, you only have to learn how to do particular actions, easy movements but deathly.
2016-04-11 22:23:50 · answer #3 · answered by isadora 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
India and Pakistan being sovereign powers developed nuclear weapons because they saw fit to do so. It would be in the best interest of any power that was capable of developing such weapons to have a few just to keep the big powers in line.
2006-10-31 11:15:50 · answer #4 · answered by oldhippypaul 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
what's ur problem now...r u an indian or pakistani..or some other......now a days may ofe'm have Atomic...nd some of'em r not allowed coz of thier instability or it's their limited capacity to hold atomics....in case of india nd pakistan....these the only countries aprt from china in Asia that can be ranked after developed europian countries...and have much stability than ny other...one can rely on these countries.........
2006-10-31 11:00:04 · answer #5 · answered by nari 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I notice you said "we ALLOWED India and Pakistan to have them". Why is it that Brits / Americans allow themselves the right to have nuclear weapons, whilst casting judgement over others having them? It seems very much "do as I say, not as I do".
2006-10-31 11:06:50 · answer #6 · answered by Les 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
what do you mean you allwed them to get atomic weapons, they dont have to ask you you know
you already asked this question but it boils down to this , india is too powerfull for the usa and india and pakisatn have responsible governements who wont bomb the usa but they will bomb each other
iran and nth korea are run by crazies who may bomb new york becuse it is a wednesday
2006-10-31 10:58:53 · answer #7 · answered by Bryn L 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"we allowed" Your arrogance is astounding. I assume you live in a country with more atomic weapons than either of those countries.
2006-10-31 11:06:03 · answer #8 · answered by katy1pm 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
In layman language , having nuclear weapons is to say to others " don't you dare try anything funny on me , i will blow you motherfxxkers out of this earth . "
forget about karate ,kungfu , if you want to learn self defence , go nuclear.
2006-10-31 23:34:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they have stuck two fingers up to the world and developed them, supposedly for border protection.
2006-11-04 08:58:51 · answer #10 · answered by ?Master 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋