English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

Here you go.

2006-10-31 09:09:35 · answer #1 · answered by Tim 6 · 0 0

Not sure, But the statistical likelihood that evolution could create something as simple as a cells flagellum is 1 to 1 (with 40,000 zeros behind it). And, unlike evolution which has no real proof, there are historical records that shows Jesus actually lived. No proof he was the son of God though. But that's why it's called faith. In both cases.

2006-10-31 17:04:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

A numerical system cannot be put upon a mythical situation...

Typically, a situatin such as this would have an equal probability of 50/50. However, once subjective thoughts are added to the mix, this probability increases or decreases dependant upon one's faith...

Some guy wrote a book, starting at 50/50 probability. The highest he could reach was ~60% chance for existence - throwing in his own subjective criteria. Then, he totals it at 95% when he adds "faith" to the mix....

Goes to show that statistics can be manipulated to suit anyone's views....

2006-10-31 17:06:33 · answer #3 · answered by YDoncha_Blowme 6 · 0 1

Simple the Intelligent see him everywhere and the less intelligent cant see him at all. Did you know Krishna Says in The Gita "I am the source of remembrance and forgetfulness." Its like this. You know when someone knocks on the front door and the father tells his son who is going to answer the door. " Tell him I am not home. " So the son goes to the door and says "My father says He is not home. " So to those who do not want to believe in Him. God says OK " I'm not here. If that what you want. Man proposes God disposes. Go to www.stephen-knapp.com for more universal info.

2006-10-31 17:08:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Given certain conditions i.e. the complex yet orderliness of creatures at all levels, I'd say the stats are good for there being a Creator.

2006-10-31 17:03:14 · answer #5 · answered by Archer Christifori 6 · 1 1

It is either 100%, or zero. You cannot average it at 50/50.

On the basis of available evidence i.e. one book, I would say 0%.

2006-10-31 17:05:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

you're here on this planet... I'd say his statistics are pretty good

2006-10-31 17:03:21 · answer #7 · answered by diva 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers