Creationists: Please list scientific evidence pointing towards a creator of the Universe?

Question

I want to make an alternative argument for Creationism or I.D. and I need the list of scientific discoveries that point to the Universe having a creator instead of the universe existing naturally and for itself rather than as an extension of any supernatural beings like gods, to explain its existence.


thanks in advance

Answer 1

Mathematical probability, as given by Hoyle, states that the chances of life to spontaneously evolve out of a primordial soup is one in 10 to the 40,000 power. Now scientists agree that anything beyond one in 10 to the 50th power is consider an impossibility. So imagine adding 39,950 more zeros onto those odds!

Can we use math in proving the existence of God? Actually, yes we can. God has provided the proof through prophecy. No other "holy book" can provide prophecy beside the Bible, and it is the Bible that declares a Creator God.
Dr. Peter Stoner (in an analysis that was carefully reviewed and pronounced to be sound by the American Scientific Affiliation) states that the probability of just eight prophecies being fulfilled in just one person is 1 in 10 to the 17th power. However, Jesus fuflilled 300 specific prophecies. So, mathematically, the odds are in overwhelming favor of the Creator God written in the pages of the Bible rather than in the overwhelming odds against evolution.

http://www.shalach.org/PropheciesTable/prophecieslist2.htm

Answer 2

Its funny whenever you ask Creationists any question how the answers always look like answers to the request: "Please give me some examples of logical fallacies."

This one has been used several times here so

"Accident and God" are what is called a false dichotomy.

Just because one rules out random chance which is a strawman anyway, one is not left with "It must be god then"

The Question Man - you are begging the question You say Life cannot come from nonlife. First - you have no evidence for such a claim. Second How do you claim your god created Adam from dust if he could not make life from non life. You really need to go back to square one. And By the way use a scientific dictionary.

A Scientific Theory IS NOT A GUESS!!!!

Answer 3

This is a very good TRICK question. There simply is no physical evidence that the earth and all living things have a single creator. It's actually very irritating to see the CREATIONISTS attack EVOLUTION when your question had nothing to do with EVOLUTION. CREATIONISTS simply cannot give you any single piece of EVIDENCE that we indeed have a creator. And in any event, even if you could without a doubt disprove evolution, that doesn't lend any more credibility to CREATIONISM. Nothing on this planet or any planet for that matter will ever give PROOF of god. Anything any BELIEVER tells you is simply a matter of opinion, otherwise known as FAITH.

Answer 4

Science claims life evolves, but there had to be a very first life form. Life can't evolve from non-life, so that means that very first life form had nothing to evolve from, so it had to be created by a being that was intelligent enough to create life. That being is God.

And that proves life was created, and blows the scientific theory of evolution out of the water. Evolution is unproven voodoo science. When a scientific theory is proven, they then call it a law, such as the Law of gravity, which was proven.

A theory is a guess, look in any dictionary, that is what it means.

Answer 5

You can set your watch by the way the planets move. In persist order no random bumping into each other.
The sun, which is a medium-sized star in the "nucleus around which the earth and the other planets with their moons move in precise orbits. Year after year, they revolve with such mathematical certainty that astronomers can accurately predict where they will be at any future time.
Then looking into the infinitesimal things-Atoms- we see that the same precision exists. An atom is a marvel or order, resembling the order of the solar system. It includes a nucleus containing particles orbiting electrons. All matter is made up of these building blocks. what makes one substance differ from the other is the number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus and the number and arrangement of the electrons revolving around it.
It would be impossible for that to happen by chance.

Answer 6

The Intelligent Design argument is well known. You should already know that it is and extrapolation much as any other like the Big Bang. You seek to discredit Christians. That is also well known. Do you want to explore spiritual truth or just bash Christians, or both? I will be waiting for your response.

Answer 7

I am not a creationist, but I do believe in a creator. I am going to provide you with a link to some articles that talk about why some Scientists believe in God and creation. I think you should be able to find some interesting information. You will notice several links to other articles from this page.

http://www.watchtower.org/library/g/2004/6/22/article_02.htm

Answer 8

Okay,take a fish out of water.What does it do?It dies.Throw a cow in the ocean,what does it do?It dies.Let a whale beach itself,what does it do?It dies.Try teaching a monkey to speak,what does it do?It looks at you in confusion.
There is not,nor was there ever an organic soup.Life comes only from life.
Look at the shirt you are wearing.It had to be designed and made.The peroxide you bleach your hair with,lol,it had to be designed and made.The chair you sit in had to be designed and made.Do you see the pattern?This is really not a question worthy of an answer since you already have your mind made up,so why did you bother asking?
Get over it already!Don't go to a creation vs. evolution conference or you will get your insignificant little world imploded.

Answer 9

There no physical scientific evidence just like there isn't for evolution which has been disproven. Believers have spiritual evidence that they can only see and feel. Unbelievers are blinded by Satan which shows that they can't comprehend spiritual truths and the existence of their creator because of sin.

Shalom

Answer 10

do you recognize the thank you to cook dinner? undergo with me, i'm unquestionably answering... you commence from seed, no remember if plant or animal. as quickly as that seed sprouts, into it is going countless supplies to effectively mature, at which factor that's harvested. The grains, end result, animal products are then processed (in different words decrease, floor, squeezed or whichever). those processed aspects are heavily measured and mixed at the same time, then placed into and proper receptacle. final yet no longer least, the entire subject is cooked... The bits replace into an entire cake. At no single factor became any of this technique an twist of fate. The seed became grown on objective, the fruit picked, the milk and eggs gathered. the aggregate became functional. The oven did no longer turn itself on. The earth as defined in Genesis became bare. flowers, animal... all have been jumbled in on the proper time; some first, some later, and a few continually. I think of God did desire a definite quantity of randomness available, with the aid of fact the worldwide (his 'cake') would replace because it went by using that's potential of fixing into liveable for human beings. We ensue to require an unquestionably very particular set of parameters wherein to exist. thousands and thousands of years of vegetation, ocean algae and and so on. gave us the proper combination to respire. A cake takes between a million/2 to a million hour to make, based. The bible says that to God one thousand years is as an afternoon. the worldwide and each thing in that's a reasonably great 'cake', so it took a at an analogous time as to cook dinner up. You look to think of you're an twist of fate, from what i will tell. Peace. EDIT: For H@z@r@h; I checked you published sites and that i'd desire to assert something. there's a declare on the 'answering christianity one that is a lie. That lie is: "The Bible in Leviticus 20:21 helps persons to marry their infants." What Leviticus 20:21 unquestionably says is {If a guy takes his brothers' spouse that's an unclean subject. He has uncovered his brothers nakedness. They would be childless.} i'm so appalled somebody would attempt to perpetuate the type of disgusting lie that i will proceed to peruse the region to locate others. you're welcome to touch me and debate them, in case you care to.