English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-31 03:56:56 · 5 answers · asked by sisterly love 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

5 answers

Hindu law books, from the first century onwards, categorize ayoni (non-vaginal sex) as impure. But penances prescribed for same-sex acts are very light compared to penances for some types of heterosexual misconduct, such as adultery and rape. The Manusmriti exhorts a man who has sex with a man or a woman in a cart pulled by a cow, or in water or by day to bathe with his clothes on (11.174). The Arthashastra imposes a minor fine on a man who has ayoni sex (4.13.236). Modern commentators misread the Manusmriti’s severe punishment of a woman’s manual penetration of a virgin (8.369-70) as anti-lesbian bias. In fact, the punishment is exactly the same for either a man (8.367) or a woman who does this act, and is related not to the partners’ genders but to the virgin’s loss of virginity and marriageable status. The Manusmriti does not mention a woman penetrating a non-virgin woman, and the Arthashastra prescribes a negligible fine for this act. The sacred epics and the Puranas (fourth to fourteenth-century compendia of devotional stories) contradict the law books; they depict Gods, sages, and heroes springing from ayoni sex. Unlike sodomy, ayoni sex never became a major topic of debate or an unspeakable crime. There is no evidence of anyone in India ever having been executed for same-sex relations.

Another sacred text, the fourth-century Kamasutra, emphasizes pleasure as the aim of intercourse. It categorizes men who desire other men as a “third nature,” further subdivides them into masculine and feminine types, and describes their lives and occupations (such as flower sellers, masseurs and hairdressers). It provides a detailed description of oral sex between men, and also refers to long-term unions between men. Hindu medical texts dating from the first century A.D. provide taxonomies of gender and sexual variations, including same-sex desire.

2006-11-01 17:05:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In Hinduism, you are respected for whatever you are. They believe that everything and everyone goes into series of development through reincarnation. What you are at present can be gift whether you are in good situation or not in a good situation. There is gift of blessing and there is a gift of having to learn more in life. So, whatever you are no matter how you look at your self and how people look at you, try your best to do what is good. Some sacrifice, learning and understanding maybe needed as you search for the reason why some people are born different from what is normal.

2006-10-31 04:14:30 · answer #2 · answered by Rallie Florencio C 7 · 3 1

Homosexuality and Hindu law. Ancient Hindu law books, from the first century onwards, categorize ayoni (non-vaginal sex) as impure. But penances prescribed for same-sex acts are very light compared to penances for some types of heterosexual misconduct, such as adultery and rape. The Manusmriti exhorts a man who has sex with a man or a woman in a cart pulled by a cow, or in water or by day to bathe with his clothes on (11.174). The Arthashastra imposes a minor fine on a man who has ayoni sex (4.13.236). Modern commentators misread the Manusmriti’s severe punishment of a woman’s manual penetration of a virgin (8.369-70) as anti-lesbian bias. In fact, the punishment is exactly the same for either a man (8.367) or a woman who does this act, and is related not to the partners’ genders but to the virgin’s loss of virginity and marriageable status. The Manusmriti does not mention a woman penetrating a non-virgin woman, and the Arthashastra prescribes a negligible fine for this act. The sacred epics and the Puranas (fourth to fourteenth-century compendia of devotional stories) contradict the law books; they depict Gods, sages, and heroes springing from ayoni sex. Unlike sodomy, ayoni sex never became a major topic of debate or an unspeakable crime. There is no evidence of anyone in India ever having been executed for same-sex relations.

2006-10-31 04:06:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

A hindu friend once told me that there have been periods and cultures in hinduism that considered homosexual males to be a 'third' gender, eligable to all the rights of marriage to another male as would be a female.

This is only hearsay though, I cannot personally verify his claim.

2006-10-31 03:59:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

yeah, it's ok.

2006-10-31 04:01:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers