How come non believers?

Question

Believe the lies in the test books on evolution.
True scientists have turned there backs on alot of the lies. The only problem they are excomunicated from the science community.

Answer 1

Good point Allan
there have been many scientists who have disproved evolution and the big bang

One day every knee will bow and every tongue will confess He is God-yahooo
bless you and your day

Answer 2

I don't think there is such a concept as being "excommunicated" from the World of Science- at least not in the same way that is described by religious doctrine. A practicing scientist might be disputed, disproved,or ignored even but only for a while. They have been known to return to the lecturn later with whatever evidence/knowledge necessary to reclaim the attention and respect of their peers. It's true that valid scientific postulate is based on limited but demonstrable fact- what they cannot explain they say "I don't know".

Answer 3

What do you mean by "true scientists"? The ones who advocate a distinctly non-scientific viewpoint? Note that scientific theories are by definition based on observed phenomena, are falsifiable, and have predictive validity. Since it's logically impossible to prove a negative (i.e. there is no God), creationism/intelligent design is not science no matter how much your "true scientists" want it to be.

Note that there may indeed be a supernatural power that created the world, but science deals with the observable and thus that hypothetical supernatural power lies outside of the realm of science.

Answer 4

It takes a long time for teachers and schools to replace outdated books.

Some outdated things NEVER get found.

I was doing a history of female filmmakers. I mean I was really doing a history. I contacted as many living ones as I could find to talk with them and ask them questions.

One was Evelyn Lambert who worked with Norman McLaren at the National Film Board of Canada.

One of the things she told me is that EVERY history text on filmmaking and animation has her biography WRONG.

Her biography says she was schooled in Science. She TOLD ME over the phone that was INCORRECT. She went to Art School. She just loves science, but she was never schooled in it.

Yet every book, from the classic works like "A Short History of the Movies" to Len Maltin's books on Animation got it wrong, becuse they USE THE SAME WRONG ROOT SOURCE.

They simply OPEN BOOKS to WRITE NEW BOOKS

They NEVER BOTHER TO PICK UP THE PHONE and call a living person who was THERE.

I also contacted Chuck Jones about women he worked with, according to text books, and he didn't recall working with them.

Hence I think the author mixed up Chuck Jones with Robert McKimsom, who did work with two women animators at Warners.

This, then is how PH Ds in COLLEGE are taught ALL WRONG.

Real world example.

In my 5th grade Music class in a Chicago Public School the teacher wrote some symbols on the black board. She asked what this was.

My mother was a professional musician and taught me about music since I was 7 years old, so I raised my hand and answered it:

G Clef

"Wrong!"

She pronounced.

Then she said it was a "trebel" clef.

After going home all depressed thinking my mother was a dolt and all I learned from her was a lie, she told it was both and showed it to me in the dictionary.

After that I went to school realizing my Music teacher was a first class idiot who, when faced with an answer contrary or different, yet accurate, from what she LEARNED in her little BA course in college, pronounces you to be

WRONG

A defintive statement

You are learning from an idiot!

And idiots teach school.

They teach 5th grade

They teach advanced physics in college

And if you go through life believe the lunacy taught by your idiot teachers without ever questioning the sources or looking for other points of view you are a fool.

This is why they require a Dissertation in most colleges for a PHD. That is breaking new ground. They want you to tell them something they never knew before, using a lot of information they do know and new things you discovered with good methods.

You don't get a PH D by answering true false questions on a test, like you do a BA degree!

It is a fact that in 1953 two scientists "claimed" they created an amino acid from inorganic matter. But no one has been able to duplicate their work.

The scientist can then HIDE behind the RANDOMIST theory that duplication is not always possible.

In other words RANDOMISTS do believe if you put a bunch of electronics parts into a box and have a monkey shake them up, sometime over a period of 1 billion years a TV set will be produced in that box randomly by the monkey, without using a soldering gun.

Answer 5

Because "text" books are based on observed and studied events or facts in the world. Not on religious beliefs which depend on the religion that you are looking out from.
By "true" scientists, you mean ones that believe as you do? Or just ones who ignore facts, for their personal beliefs?
Everyone has a right to their beliefs. It doesn't make them right though, so you can believe any lie you choose, so long as you don't try and force it on to others.

Answer 6

Please show what is a lie about it (especially with this new strain of bird flu that is out this year, that our current vaccine can not take out).... and then list the Scientists.

I can sit here all day and say "those scientists have proven that witchcraft is real, but the problem is no one will let them publish their findings"..... SO please list these scientists and we'll see How one can be excommunicated from the science community... which is World Wide.

Answer 7

Evolution is a theory, it is taught as a theory. If in time a better one comes along - I am sure they will teach that one instead as the most "suggested" theory. There were others before it and there will be some after it.

But you can't call a theory a lie. It's just a theory or an educated guess.

A lie is would be when you state a guess as fact... creation theory is also a theory... for someone to believe in that and say that it is a fact would also be a lie then.

Answer 8

I have found in life that people would rather believe in lies then the truth they say that the truth hurts there may be some truth to that but lies kill they destroy trust and it is so easy for people to lie even raise there children to believe in lies like Santa, the Easter Bunny The Tooth Fairy The Boogie man oh forget that one he's real that's Satan.
But i have found that i tell someone the truth and they think i am lying. you are guilty until proven innocent.

Answer 9

Is a true scientist the same thing as a true Christian? How do you determine the truth of a system of discovery? Is the internet true? Is my keyboard true? How do you determine what is a lie? Is it based on your own personal observation, or what you have read in a book?

Answer 10

Because most people say seeing is believing, and some peopl have a hard time believing in something that to them seem like an overactive imagination of many people. I believe in God and Jesus, But I also believe in Evolution. If u would look at everything logically u can see how these things coincide.

Answer 11

Well, I could say you're blinded by your faith, where as you could say I'm blinded by the "lies" told by these bad scientists. In the end, both of us are believing in something we have FAITH is the right answer. I believe evolution does happen, and I believe that science is an ever-changing world, you believe in something entirely different, but that doesn't mean I have to call it necessarily untrue.