2006-10-31 02:40:56 · 16 answers · asked by wannasmile 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
I married practical but turned it into very passionate. The best of both worlds my dear.
2006-10-31 02:42:58 · answer #1 · answered by mychemicalromancelover 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both. Practical w/o passion is boring. While passion w/o practicality is living in a fantasy world.
2006-10-31 10:44:12 · answer #2 · answered by From the "ATL"! 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Seek and ye shall find.
The first thing is to meet people and go from there. Be practical but whimsical, that will lead to passion.
2006-10-31 10:44:00 · answer #3 · answered by gagam 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You need to have both. You need to know when you need to be practical and when to let the passion flow.
2006-10-31 10:42:52 · answer #4 · answered by kitcat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is better to balance both. Practicallity without passion leaves you dry and unhappy. Passion without practicallity is fanciful and leaves you unhappy and overwhelmed.
"An irrational passion for dispassionate rationality will take all the joy out of life." -John Maurice Clark
2006-10-31 10:45:38 · answer #5 · answered by xretroflowerx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if one's seeking a long-term relationship, i'ld say more practical than passionate.
2006-10-31 10:46:22 · answer #6 · answered by blizdala 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Passionate, of course.
2006-10-31 10:42:52 · answer #7 · answered by me8md 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its better not to seek it. When the time is right it will come but if you look for it your not gonna find it.
2006-10-31 11:17:33 · answer #8 · answered by kissedwithpeace 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
practical first then passionate
2006-10-31 10:44:52 · answer #9 · answered by postal_marg 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should probably find one somewhere in between. That is my experience. You will need both at various times if it's going to last.
2006-10-31 10:44:56 · answer #10 · answered by randyken 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋