25
2006-10-31 01:51:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by MaryBeth 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
i think a WOMAN (not a girl as a girl is a child and children dint need a baby) should be at least 18 but would be better over the age of 20. she should be married. since most men split when not commited to the woman/ there needs to be financial security. both have jobs with really good insurance. or at the very least he has a great job so she doesnt need to work and stay home with the baby. both parties need to be matire and have a place to live hencethe reason for marriage
2006-10-31 02:23:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by kleighs mommy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
When her body, mind, and emotions are ready to deal with it. For some women, it's 20, for some, it's 40.
I'm 21, married, own a home, have a great career, and I feel like I'm ready EMOTIONALLY, but I know that I should wait for other reasons. Well, part of me feels like I need to wait because society believes that I am too young. I'm sorry, but why is it not okay to start a family at 21 when you have all of your stuff in line, but it's perfectly okay, normal, and accepted to be out getting drunk and sleeping around at 21 in some sorority or fraternatiy? Sometimes I think we have it all backwards. Feminism stepping on it's own toes.
2006-10-31 01:55:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by breannaat 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think there is a certain age requirement to start having children. I also disagree with those who seem to think having a college education is important to be a mother as well. I think a mature, moral woman (not girl) who is able to teach her child values and properly support it and provide it with all the support a child needs--with or without a degree is a perfect candidate for mother.
2006-10-31 02:18:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by 07jaggrad 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no specific age but a girl shouldn't think of having chirldren till about 19 or 20. Because the cervix is not fully expanded and should she have a baby at lets say 16 complications may arise.
2006-10-31 01:54:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ukemson 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
25 to 30
2006-10-31 01:51:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by bor_rabnud 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
One should be mature, financially, emotionally and psychologically ready to take care of little ones before one has any regardless of gender. When you are ready and willing to take better care of someone else than you are of yourself, then you are old enough to have children. Age is important only if you have not got the wherewith-all to provide a proper life for a child.
2006-10-31 01:55:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by HGS 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I had mine when I was 21 and 23.
My mom was 20 and 23.
My grand mother was older. Like in her late 20's early 30's.
Making money should come first so you can support your self and your child if your husband/ boyfriend / what ever/ decided to leave.
Do not ever trust what they say like "I will NEVER leave you". Just take care of your self first.
As you can tell I have been through it.
Good luck.
2006-10-31 02:02:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by jen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I feel like they should when they are mature enough to handle it. I was 17 when I had my son. I was still a kid but it made me grow up fast. I wish I would have waited until I was a little older because i feel like i would have had more patience then. BUT I love my son. I also know women who are in their 30s and 40s and are horrible mothers because they arent mature. So i truly believe its a maturity issue instead of just a number.
2006-10-31 02:21:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by BooBoo Momma 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
At the age where she can be responsible for not only herself but anothering human beign. When she is emotionally and financially ready to bear the burden of raising a child.
2006-10-31 02:12:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋