English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The liger, mule and other such creatures prove the reproduction law, you cannot cross different SPECIES to get for ex:a snake that has eagle wings as a result of crossing a snake and an eagle. The liger is still a cat, just as a beagle crossed with a poodle is still a dog, you started with 2 dogs. Crossing within the horse family will get you a mule but it is still yet the result of matting within the horse family. All of the above support the law for reproducing, as found in the book of Genisis. God made this law and even though man has tried to prove it wrong, the law still stands! The Word of the Lord will stand forever! Taste and see that the Lord is good, blessed are those who take refuge in Him

2006-10-31 01:16:34 · 4 answers · asked by ? 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

4 answers

I can see that your family tree doesnt have nearly enough branches either.

2006-10-31 01:20:03 · answer #1 · answered by uncle J 4 · 0 0

I would use the word "kind" instead of "species" as it says in the Bible.

I am quite sure that there are some different species that will reproduce to make a new species. That is because the system of identifying species is not accurate (they are debating on how to redue and define what qualifies as a separate species), where as the Bible says that one kind will reproduce after its own kind. If two things can not reproduce together then they are probably not the same kind (note: maybe kind 1 and kind 2 can not reproduce, but kind 1 and kind 3 can, and this new kind can reproduce with kind 2. 1 and 2 could not reproduce because (because of size or what ever), say #1 was a hose cat and #2 was a lion. But #1 could reproduce with #3 (a bobcat) and their offspring could reproduce with #2(lion).

2006-10-31 01:27:42 · answer #2 · answered by tim 6 · 0 0

Many kinds of dogs, cats, horses, plants, humans. But, no species of dog/cat, horse/human. Not complicated. God's law stands.

2006-10-31 01:21:02 · answer #3 · answered by Red neck 7 · 0 0

Amen. And I believe cloning is going too far as it violates this law.

2006-10-31 01:20:37 · answer #4 · answered by RB 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers