English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-31 00:45:30 · 8 answers · asked by jsjmlj 5 in Politics & Government Military

battle , not a whole war .

2006-10-31 00:53:21 · update #1

8 answers

Since I can not email you.........................I will respond to your reporting of me here....REF: I was wondering in the constitution isnt tere a plain as day clause that says flee bargening is illegal?
I'm a victom of the court system .I was basically told that if I did'nt pleade gulity that they would make sure I got maximum time in jail wich was 90 days for petty crime.So with my job my kids and everything to looze I plead guily because the flee bargain was a 200 doller fine.I see this alot.Peaple pleading guilty because they are afraid of getting the maximmum because of threats from the D.A
were is the justis in this country.They are building jail after jail and their seems to be no end to the new laws.what can be done about this screwed up system they just made it illegal for people to be homeless in L.A Yes they will put you in jail for having no were to live.what is it all about money


Best answers:
go back where you came from..see if you get "better justice"

Tell me what does "flee bargening" mean?? Learn your grammar and how to spell.....You still need to get a proper education. Report me again ... I really do not care. If lyou can not handle the answers then do not ask the question. You expect everyone to agree with you? Poor soul get over it and screw yahoo if you want to delete this! I still like the first answer...Go back to where you came from and see if you have a better legal system.... you know damn well that you don't. Ours is not perfect but it is far better that what you had. You don't like my answers then email me and tell me all about it. Not crying to yahoo! Get over it Mike!

Yes it is all about the money! They have what they need to convict you. You PLEA to a lessor charge you get less time......Cost me the taxpayer more money to prosecute you .......then you get the maX! That is how it work here in the USA>

2006-11-01 07:11:15 · answer #1 · answered by tbear 5 · 0 0

Decisive and most casualties are different meanings. The most decisive battles of all time would probably be The battle of waterloo and the battle of trafalger(naval) these saw england remain the dominant power ,and as a result saw america safe from the french-spanish alliance (america was not that strong in those days and the spanish-french could easily have invaded and took most of the north american continent.

yeah d-day was a large operation with many casualties, but technically it was not a battle, rather a campaign with several different battles. The battle of normandy had 425,000 casualties.

The battle of starlingrad in world war II was the biggest and most lethal battle in all time with an amazing 1, 640,000 casualties. This was a decisive battle that basically stopped germany's invasion of the USSR (an ally) in the beginning of world war II. (the russians won)

For a list of most lethal battles go to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_lethal_battles_in_world_history

2006-10-31 00:57:31 · answer #2 · answered by cokie_999 2 · 1 0

You are equating 'decisive' with 'casualties' - sometimes small (ish) casualties result from decisive battles. The battle of Culloden in Scotland was the last battle on British soil. It ended Scottish resistance to England on the battle field from 1746 to the present day. 1,200 scots were killed and around 330 English.

That is pretty decisive.

The Battle of The Bulge (WW2) was a series of encounters which broke Nazi resistance in the West, but the Russians were also beating Hitler in the East and won the race to Berlin.

Your question is one of OPINION, rather than being able to point to one battle throughout history.

2006-10-31 00:53:05 · answer #3 · answered by limey_not_lime 5 · 0 1

The most decisive battle would be World War I. This war sowed the seeds for the coming war which was the bloodiest war ever! A sixth of the Russian populace was wiped out in the campaign against Nazi Germany.

2006-10-31 00:49:01 · answer #4 · answered by swimmaholik 3 · 0 1

Sharpsburg during the American Civil War had nearly 20,000 casualties in one day of fighting.

2006-10-31 02:34:46 · answer #5 · answered by Michael 5 · 0 0

Antietam...over 22,000 casualties in 1 day of fighting. That is all Americans, both sides either killed wounded or missing.

2006-10-31 00:53:45 · answer #6 · answered by Brian G 2 · 1 0

world war 2

2006-10-31 00:51:59 · answer #7 · answered by teddy bear 1 · 0 2

In modern history it would have to be D-Day with 8,334 casualties in one day.

2006-10-31 00:48:24 · answer #8 · answered by tom l 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers