And before that, following the severe, long lasting winter of 1962/63 we were assured that a new ice age was imminent. Then, as you say, in the 1970's we were told that oil would run out within 15 to 20 years. Now we are informed that the world is going to suffer irreversibly from 'global warming'.
No wonder the ordinary citizen is so cynical about government pronouncements. Most of us see these reports as an excuse for extracting more taxes from each of us, whether rich or poor - but the poorest will pay the most in terms of their available income. And into which category do members of the government fall? The richest, of course! So any stringent measures they impose will not affect them to any great degree. Bring on the revolution, I say!
2006-10-30 20:07:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by avian 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well it stands to reason that oil is a finite resource and must one day be depleted.
However I think it is sometimes used as a political lever to distract people's attention from more embarrassing government failures - much the same as the current talk about climate change and global warming. It gives the politicians something else to talk about - a breathing space.
For these reasons I am not going to worry about it.
2006-10-30 20:28:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by George 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you look at the consumption figures for oil versus production - you will see that while we are years away from "running out" - we are close to Peak Oil - ie when consumpttion matches production. After that demand will outstrip supply - leading to a surge in prices.
Remember the energy crisis was brought about by a drop in supply of about 5-10% - and look at the chaos caused.
2006-10-30 20:11:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by MB42 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Primo, welcome to capitalism. The president won't have the flexibility to change the fee of gasoline, until ultimately he intervened contained contained accessible. Which in accordance to you is communism, it is undesirable in accordance to you besides. i understand what capitalism is, yet you do no longer. in case you probable did understand what CAPITALISM replaced into, you will not be blaming the president for extra effective gasoline costs. on the comparable time as some undertaking is demanded and each individual is trusted, it is going to easily skyrocket for earnings for worldwide capitalists. additionally, you opt to quit asserting "FAIL". you seem as though a moron. Oh wait, you're a conservative, no ask your self why you are the form of pseudo-psychological. particularly, you, sir, are incorrect. that's no longer any further corporatism, yet imperialism defined by way of Vladimir Lenin. Capitalism will consistently lead into imperialism or corporatism, as you define that element era. additionally, "EPIC FAIL" is so smart. on the comparable time inclusive of your a million sentence responses. you opt to get a sparkling comeback different than "fail", you interest my memory of 12 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous women texting.
2016-12-09 00:12:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
as mining techniques advance they are able to extract more oil from old reserves.
2006-10-30 19:57:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by tommo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
we MIGHT die...since we have advanced technology these days, we are practically killing ourselves...even with the computer...your just murdering the next generation
2006-10-30 20:46:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋