Unbelievable what folks on here have to say about evolution.
How in hell do they explain biogeology? Some critters and plants are HERE but no THERE. Polars bears are in the arctic, penguins in the antarctic. Why not the reverse? Why not both in the same place? "God did it" explains absolutely nothing.
If these idiots could only learn to think of evolution as the geneaology of a species, perhaps they wouldn't get so screwed up.
They love to claim that you can't show the first living cell, so evolution is false. That's exactly like claiming that they can't start with Adam and Eve to prove who their parents are, so they popped into existence in the form they are in today.
Stupid, stupid people!!!
2006-10-30 11:08:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
technological know-how is there to be puzzled, each and all of the final scientists do it. interior the Nineteen Sixties one and all believed the 'stable state theory' of the universe. it extremely is that it had consistently existed and consistently might. Then readings from area made human beings question this. some holders of the stable state theory reacted merely such as you stated, however the scientists with the hot theory maintains to question and debate. Now one and all believes interior the enormous bang. A biologist believed that abdomen ulcers have been brought about via a virulent disease. all the different scientists laughed at him, regardless of each and every thing, each and every knew the tummy became a strategies too acid to have viruses in it. He persisted, ultimately swallowing the virus himself, and getting an ulcer to tutor his hypothesis. This purely handed off ten years in the past. i'm no longer anti-technological know-how, yet i'm professional-smart questioning. If something can't be challenged then it has no properly worth.
2016-11-26 19:46:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually science was started to figure out how God did things. Throughout history religion was an intergral part of science. It is only in modern times that the two are viewed as mutually exclusive.
2006-10-30 09:09:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Science is like a religion to some people. And you may not burn in Hell but you'll be shunned from any future scientific discussion. If you don't believe me, go to a Sierra Club meeting and tell them that the evidence does not support man-caused global warming. By the time you leave, you'll feel like you've been through the Inquisition.
2006-10-30 08:54:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Crusader1189 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Well, at least science invites questions and does so without threats of damnation.
As one who believes in God, I cringe when I see fellow believers try and give scientific "proofs" for their faith. If God is truly Eternal, Transcendent and Uncircumscribable, science cannot be employed to prove His existence because science is based upon the temporal laws of the physical universe.
2006-10-30 10:44:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by davidscottwoodruff 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
science is like a religion touting more hate and intollerance than what you people think Christians do! Science tells people they are animals, and totally subject to their own idiotic thoughts and limited by experience. Science teaches there is no afterlife, only nothingness as your body goes in the ground. What's the point of life then? And the times I use the word science, I use it losely because there is no proof of evolution, only proof of God creating all that we see. How can an evolutionist know what is right or wrong? How can an evolutionist get mad at someone who rapes them or molests their child, isn't that person merely following his animal desires, subject to no moral standards and no higher authority? If we are really our own gods, have you thought THAT option out to it's conclusion? Murder and strife are ONLY to follow if all bought into the evolution theory. Do you really think that NO GOD ever was? NO ONE to tell us what's right or wrong? NO ONE to make sure we'd live as long as we have? I could go on and on, but I do question science, I hate the lies it teaches in schools to this day, things only written in textbooks but never proven, or even worse have been disproven yet still get printed in books. You people think that the bible is full of lies? Check out your local science book. It's sad what little you'd have left of your precious book if all the lies were torn out.
2006-10-30 09:02:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by mamatoshreksboys 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Most things that are called "science" are truly scientific, like physics and chemistry, but evolution is a religion that has no basis in science. It takes a great deal of faith to believe that a dog can produce a non-dog (dog here is defined as any member of the family "canidae"). It takes a great deal of faith to believe that life can spring from non-life (I believe that was disproven a couple hundred years ago).
What evolutionists believe is a "mountain of evidence" to support their theory is nothing more than a smattering of facts that have been assigned a faulty interpretation. For example, it's a fact that the Grand Canyon exists. There are two interpretations as to how it got that way. One is that it took a little bit of water and a lot of time, and the other is that it took a lot of water and a little bit of time. However, the evolutionists want you to believe that their interpretation (the first one) is part of the fact! Beware of swallowing their interpretations as fact! Every aspect of evolutionary theory falls prey to this problem.
2006-10-30 08:54:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by FUNdie 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
I only dare to ?? theories with no facts, unstable basis and authors who present data that goes against probability. Other than that no prob.
2006-10-30 08:55:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by spareo1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I only have one question for science....Is pluto a planet?
2006-10-30 09:29:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by msender77 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
science isn't religion
2006-10-30 10:21:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by JaimeM 5
·
2⤊
0⤋