what is the difference between state and federal cases?

Answer 1

In Federal cases the type of controversy or the amount being disputed makes a difference (meaning there must be a question involving Federal law, or multi-state jurisdiction, or there must be over $75K in dispute). For large corporations they almost always will push to have the cases heard in Federal court because the judges are generally less biased and turn out results more favorable to big business. The reason for less bias is because Federal judges are appointed for life wherea state judges are either elected or appointed then need to receive a vote to maintain their position. Hope this helps.

Answer 2

The differences are getting smaller. But one of the main differences used to be in sentencing. Federal cases would have minimum mandatory sentences, now the states are catching up.

But I still would rather do a Federal case as opposed to doing a state case. I have never gone to trial on a Federal case.

Answer 3

nicely, they are the two very busy. The federal choose is appointed via the President, with the "advice and Consent" of the U. S. Senate. meaning the Senate has to substantiate. A state choose is the two: (a million) appointed via the Governor, or (2) elected via the persons. they are often what's observed as county judges or district judges. A federal choose has "constrained" jurisdiction. meaning that a case has to fulfill specific circumstances with a view to be filed in federal courtroom. A state choose has "popular" jurisdiction. meaning that the choose will pay attention virtually any case filed interior the courtroom. A state choose often has greater impact on community matters that the federal choose. besides the undeniable fact that, the federal choose can enter orders that impression national matters, the place the state choose often does no longer. desire that helps.

Answer 4

The difference is (1) which law is being applied, federal or state; and (2) which governmental entity is doing the prosecuting.