Intelligent Revolutionist please?

Question

There have been many noted Scientist, that aren't Christians, that show that evolution is impossible. Henry Morris, Duane Gish, Philip Johnson, Michael Denton, Michael Behe, just to name a few. There is a web site that summerizes their findings and their huge evidence against evolution. http://emporium.turnpike.net/C/cs/ Your comments are against these highly intellegent Scientist, Professors, Biologist that speak not from any religion point of view , just from the misconception of evolution. If you can honestly look at these statements then answer the question How can this be? I would be very much appreciate to find out what you feel.

I'm not interested in comments that are made 2 minutes after the question is posted, you obviously did not even read anything on the website and you chose to keep your minds closed

Answer 1

i have visited the site and i think that the following statement doesn't show non christian scientist

The magnificence of our world shows to all that there must be a creator:
"... God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities - his eternal power and divine nature - have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse."
Romans 1:19-20 NIV

Answer 2

The site doesn't understand what evolution is. There is no definition of evolution that deals with the origin of life, that is a question for our chemical minded friends.

Behes irreducible complexity has been thoroughly disproven take a look at the talkorigins website for the arguments against the arguments of evoultion.

Answer 3

Scientific research or not--there is never one definite and for all point of view on evolution. However, beyond the scientists you cite here, which represent a SMALL percentage of the overall scientific community, most scholars of science see evolution as a legitimate explanation.

Answer 4

so your extremely small percentage (on a creation biased website nonetheless) knows more than the more than 99% who agree that it is the most viable explanation? right...

Edit: good one J.P.

Edit2: It only took two minutes because I have been to the site before. I thoroughly enjoy reading through these kinds of sites to see if they hold any validity in their statements. I'm sorry to tell you but the arguments they present are erronious and misleading. Perhaps you should seek out more credible sources for your 'science'.

Answer 5

Michael Behe (who isn't even a biologist) stated-and I quote "On a small scale, Darwin's theory has triumphed; it is now about as controversial as an athlete's assertion that he or she could jump over a four-foot ditch." (Darwin's black box). Now I have you cold here because I've exposed your own words as falsehoods. Darwin has triumphed from a man who you say believes evolution is impossible? Thanks for setting yourself up to be walloped.

Answer 6

heh....Behe....

so....youve given us a link to a bad pro-creationism website....and somehow were supposed to fall to our knees and beleive in your childish magical sky daddy?

i see nothing on that site worth either merit or my time. it seems to be nothing but regurgitated misinformation and uneducated assumptions.

if you really want to get us nonbeleivers thinking try getting one of these scientists to get interviewed by a scientific journal or at least get them published in a respected scientific source.

your assumption that that site is a good source of information is incorrect. i reccomend moving on.

Answer 7

Wow, you have a few handful of names there.

What of the other 99.9% of high and respected scientists who say that handful is a bunch of idiots and prove it?

Behe's own department has renounced him: http://www.lehigh.edu/~inbios/news/evolution.htm

So, why should I consider Behe reliable or credible when HIS OWN DEPARTMENT has unanimously denounced him?