English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know farmer's do this with livestock and cats, just wondered if you could do it to a dog. Using the elastic band.

2006-10-30 05:01:31 · 21 answers · asked by Emolie 1 in Pets Dogs

I know farmers do this, I am not going to do this, just researching it for a report on animal treatment. Funny how things turn so controversial.

2006-10-30 05:34:29 · update #1

21 answers

I use to band my goats, and when we had cows, we banded the bull calves. I suppose you could do it with a dog..but it would have to be an older dog. Puppies testicles are real close to the body...would be hard to get the band around them properly. With calves and kids..the testicles are bigger and hang down lower than they do with a dog. Would I suggest someone do this?? No.

You would have to do them surgically (not that I think anyone should do this..unless they know what they are doing)..the same way the vets do it. My dad use to raise hogs and we would castrate them right in the barn. He hung them up by their back legs, numbed the area, gave them some pain killer and did his own castrating. We never had one get infected...but we kept things clean.

Oh...and I've never heard of a farmer neutering cats with a band...at least we never did.

2006-10-30 05:52:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Of course you can castrate a dog via banding.

You can castrate just about anything that way.

Banding became popular in the mid 1900's due to how easy it is. But recently it has died off because people think it's cruel. Watch out though, depending on where you live you might break the law if you do.

Having grown up on a ranch we always used a burzizzo on our dogs.

2006-11-01 21:18:25 · answer #2 · answered by rob 1 · 3 0

Actually, prior to the 1990's banding was common practice in eastern NC for castrating dogs! It wasn't until a few vets realized how much they could make from surgical removal that the process changed. It is still a common practice for large dogs and for stray cats in many rural areas.

s

2014-12-10 17:56:20 · answer #3 · answered by JASON 1 · 3 0

Dog training are excellent and very helpful to build you a stronger relationship with your dog. Read more https://tinyurl.im/SpqkJ

After I started training my dog, he became very attached to me and loves to stay by side as long as he can. But just going to them won't help. You have to practice what they teach you outside of the class and you need to keep up with it at least every now and then after the class ends otherwise they'll just go back to previous habits. This course is a really good place to go for dog obedience classes. It get's your dog around other people and dogs to socialize while getting the training you need. As for electric collars, I would say to not get one. In my experience, they're only a negative effect on your dog. I mean of course you're going to need to correct your dog, but being positive and encouraging your dog works a lot faster and easier.

Every dog is different, so unless you have a german shepherd or a really smart dog, it might take a while to train her. You might get frustrated with her, but go easy. She's still a puppy and has a lot of energy. A backyard or somewhere to run will help her get rid of a lot of energy that might cause her to misbehave from boredom.

2016-04-15 02:16:45 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Dog training techniques are as controversial as abortion, Palestine and Bill O'Reilly. But, which dog training techniques can you trust to get you out of the dog house? It will help if you think about dog training techniques as being in one of two categories: balanced and imbalanced.

The discussion about which dog training technique to use when training a dog is one that resembles a discussion between an Israeli and a Palestinian. Each one seems absolutely certain of their position and is more than ready to vilify those who don't share their views on dog training. But, if you look at dog training techniques and methods and evaluate their worth and effectiveness based on whether the approach is balanced, it's a lot easier to weed out the garbage.

For the most part, trainers and their methods fall into two main categories. Those who do not use a physical consequence as a deterrent and those who do. There are many variations in the methods used by different trainers however, almost all trainers fall into one category or the other. Some trainers use food as a reward and never allow the dog to experience a negative consequence for a poor choice. Other trainers afford the dog the opportunity to experience a consequence for making poor choices.

The Use Of Food:

Using food is great in the sense that you will probably have a very happy dog on your hands when he realizes that the training comes with an all-you-can-eat buffet. However, using food to train your dog has some pitfalls we think you should be aware of.

Food is great if you just want to impress your guests with a couple silly pet tricks but, in the real world, your dog will probably be much more interested in chasing the cat than hanging around to get your silly, dry biscuit. So, if you are using food as the primary or sole motivator, you're in for some disappointment when it comes time for your dog to perform in the real world.

Strictly Positive Reinforcement:

It is not difficult to find trainers who will tell you they use a kinder, gentler method than those used by consequence and reward trainers. They will tell you that your dog will be emotionally destroyed by the use of correction as a deterrent. Their goal is to sell you on their loving approach to dog training. They would have you believe that their method is much better than those old, barbaric correction methods.

If you try to train your dog with a method of training that is as imbalanced as this, you will be in for some serious disappointments. Sure, it sounds like a great idea; training your dog and never having to correct him for making a poor choice. Never having to do the very thing you like doing the least. However, no matter how distasteful the concept of physical consequence is to you, it is necessary if you want a really good dog. You cannot consistently praise a dog when he does something right and never give him a consequence for doing something wrong, and expect him to turn out balanced.

Consequence And Reward:

In some cases, dog training methods that involve physical consequence as a deterrent cause additional problems. Not by virtue of the fact that the dog received a physical consequence for his poor choice, but because the training was too harsh, improper, or the balance between consequence and reward was not achieved. A bad trainer can destroy any good training system. It is far from true that methods using consequence as a deterrent will result in a fearful dog. It all depends on the skill of the trainer, the manner in which the dog is corrected and the balance between consequence and reward.

Dog training techniques and methods that use a healthy balance between consequence and reward are without doubt, the most effective, healthy training techniques you can use. It is important to remember that consequence in NEVER connected to emotion while reward is always given with sincerity and love.

Before You Spend MORE Money On Expensive Dog Trainers or Products,
Watch This Video First!

https://bitly.im/DD2RE

Discover the powerful dog training secrets to eliminate over 30+ common behavioral dog and puppy issues with step-by-step instructions from one of the world's most skilled dog trainers!

2016-04-15 01:11:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

NO! You cannot. That is cruel and can lead to some really nasty infections. Just as an example, when I was working at a large clinic in Houston, some people brought in their Dachshund. Their grandfather, a Chinese immigrant who probably had lived in a very rural community in China and had little experience with companion animals, told them that they could do this to their dog to neuter him. So they wrapped a rubber band around the testicles and left it like that. Well, by the time we saw the dog, the testicles had rotted off (VERY PAINFUL!) and left a gaping wound just under the anus that was infected and fully open. We had to do some serious reconstructive surgery to repair the damage and the dog was in extreme pain by this point. Please just have your pets neutered by a competent veterinarian. There are low cost spay/neuter clinics in every area.

And as far as I know, if anybody does this to a cat, it could be considered animal cruelty.

2006-10-30 05:06:53 · answer #6 · answered by Lauren M 4 · 5 5

No, I seriously doubt that you can. It sounds a bit cruel for the dog, especially nowadays how many programs for spaying and neutering are out there. In my area, you can get all sorts of discounts to encourage spaying and neutering.

2006-10-30 05:05:33 · answer #7 · answered by crouchingpossum 3 · 2 2

Absolutely not. The vet is the one you should take the dog to and have it done by someone that knows the correct way to neuter a pet.

2006-10-30 11:00:55 · answer #8 · answered by MANDYLBH 4 · 2 1

ABOLUTELY NOT! It is dangerous and leads to infections not to mention extremely painful to the dog!

Also it is defined as animal cruelty and will get you jail time and a fine! With all the low cost; some even free, neutering clinics why would you even consider it!

2006-10-30 05:16:51 · answer #9 · answered by Melissa B 3 · 4 3

Oh boy are you gonna hear some grief on this one!

I honestly don't know if you can, but I would say no.

2006-10-30 05:05:30 · answer #10 · answered by diney2u 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers