perhaps he does know the statistics girls even though they are below 3 years and above 60 years are raped by men every second.are they being raped because of their dress. hell with Islamic fundamentalists. they are to be condemned by all feminist organizations through out the world.
2006-10-30 04:15:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by nicegirl 2
·
14⤊
0⤋
Australian prime minister, john Howard already called on Islamic leaders to deal with that sheik.he felt comments about women and rape by Australia's top Islamic cleric could do lasting damage to the Muslim community's relations with the rest of the nation.i feel that man should be imprisoned for making derogatory remarks about women.
2006-10-30 12:27:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by gameisover1972 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well he really didn't "invite" rape for women who do not go around in the death shroud-
It is like anything else- when did the right to speak freely become a crime? In Australia or anywhere else.
2006-10-30 12:07:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by IN Atlanta 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
it is not the dress of the woman that is wrong it is the mind and the eyes of a sexual perversion of a man who always look upon women as mere sex workers.
2006-10-30 12:22:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by sonar_bungala 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
They call it freedom of speech. Or do mean to imply that since he is Muslim he is not entitled to such basic right?
To speak for myself, I would confess that too much flesh on parade hugely affect my libido. No pun intended
2006-10-30 12:10:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chevalier 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
who the hell is that cleric to decide what to do and make ugly remarks. we feminists completely denounce his statements and tell the whole world that it is woman's prerogative to wear what type of clothes.
2006-10-30 12:20:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by bhaletaasha 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
you know you shouldnt be listening to these mufti's i swear they dont know anythnig. . . . . . and dont even get me started on them. . . . . they dont use "wisdom" they cant just go ahead and say that women who dont wear headscarves are inviting sexual attack. . . . . . . .
2006-10-30 12:17:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by coco 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
his comments are to be condemned by all democratic, peace loving people as they show women as sex symbols only.
2006-10-30 12:11:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't know, but damn are the parts in you ladies' avatars' hairs sexy!
Where a mask, thou wicked temptresses!
2006-10-30 12:08:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
as far as i heard,he didn't said about head scarf,he said about unmodest dress...still used harsh words.....
should have used some other words to clear his view.because my view is unmodest dress do bring sexual attraction,am i wrong??
but it doesn't mean,that who is tempted to it, is right.
2006-10-30 12:49:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋