I'm not american, but I've seen ever day the dead toll of americans in Irak is increasing, and many americans reproching this losses to your president. is it worth it ?
2006-10-30 02:10:31 · 10 answers · asked by . 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
us....marine...army..navy...special forces...recon....coast guard...all the other branches of the military
have a great ammount of power and training this dumb a$$ president obviosly doesnt know that
there are some soldiers out there that havent seen any action and are ending up getting killed without a chance to fight
president bush makes a shitty general
untill we get another president similar to ronal regan (i might of spelt that wrong)we will keep this up
the death toll will go up we will lose more troops and bush will be on his *** on vacation
so untill we get another president this will keep up thats my point
2006-10-30 12:44:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The large amount of critism we see from outside the states is largely contributed by the extremely biased media. While there is distain towards the war felt by many the majority of people did not think it was a bad decision. Otherwise they would have not voted for the same administration for another term.
Unfourtunately the americans seem to suffer worse casualty ratio's than anyone else, but that is probably because they do/did a large amount of close quarter (street) patrols.
Many of the people who scream bloody murder at the thought of iraq are nothing more than idiots who will complain at anything as to set them apart from the majority. If they did vote for bush then they made a mistake, if they didnt vote then their opinion is worth nothing.
2006-10-30 02:23:44 · answer #2 · answered by cokie_999 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The number of soldiers dying or wounded is small in comparison to what we went through in VietNam, Korea, or either World War.
In some of those battles, 3000 men were killed in one day. Just because we have better equipment now doesn't mean there will be just a few casualties. Fighting in cities is always more dangerous. And it's even harder when the opposition isn't wearing uniforms to identify good-guys from bad-guys and the good-guy Iraqis are barely ditinguishable day-to-day.
2006-10-30 02:31:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Do a little research of people killed in other wars. Over 62 million people lost their lives in WWII. Compared to other wars, Iraq is a cake walk. The deaths are just more publicized now-a-days.
2006-10-30 02:56:58 · answer #4 · answered by Cal 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why are you concerned ? They are dying there for those bastard Israeli's interest. The American lives are very cheap, not even worth asking this question and wasting your 5 points. Let them die, because they have an asshole in charge. Americans are dying and Israel is benefiting.
2006-10-30 02:26:40 · answer #5 · answered by Lexus 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
We lost more in the first week of Iwo Jima. more of the enemy is dying than us. We are winning. Americans are not cowards and will stay the course. The majority of Americans are not the ones you hear from in the media.
2006-10-30 02:14:12 · answer #6 · answered by yankeescowboyssooners 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I THINK WE NEED TO GET OUT OF THERE SOON. WE REALLY ARE NOT HELPING ANYONE AND MORE MORE YOUNG PEOPLE R DYING AT A TIME THEY SIGNED, DID NOT THINK THERE WOULD BE A WAR.
2006-10-30 02:14:02 · answer #7 · answered by marilyn b 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i`m dont speekin english!!
pregunta en español pleas
thank you por los dos puntos
2006-10-30 03:03:06 · answer #8 · answered by ALI 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it is awful for anybody to die in any war.
2006-10-30 02:30:47 · answer #9 · answered by the Goddess Angel 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
this is not war any more, this is only bloodshet! we should call our troops back home and care for other things than only waring!
2006-10-30 02:39:31 · answer #10 · answered by Lizzy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋